Up to 65% CWD prevalence in Wyoming Mule Deer Herd

atlas

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 15, 2022
Messages
427
https://www.powelltribune.com/stories/cwd-increasing-in-state-deer-elk-herds,95150

Sobering news resulting from a multi-year Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) surveillance program by the Wyoming Game and Fish Department between 2018 and 2022 shows significant increases in the fatal disease for the state’s prized mule deer and elk herds. In one herd, the prevalence rate is calculated at 65% in mule deer bucks and there are concerning increases in infected elk, including hunt areas popular for Big Horn Basin hunters.

The disease, which typically kills infected animals within two years after initial exposure, now occurs in 34 of Wyoming’s 37 mule deer herds, and 15 of the state’s 36 elk herd units. The report also reveals that the disease is increasing in younger mule deer bucks and does, which is changing the dynamics of herds.

“Because CWD positive animals only live two years, the average age of the herd slowly shifts to those younger animals and older animals become rare,” said Hank Edwards, the department’s Wildlife Health Laboratory supervisor. “Obviously, since females are the foundation of the herd, as prevalence increases and more females become infected, the reproduction, growth and resilience of the herd is constrained,” he told the Wyoming Game and Fish Commission at the July meeting in Wheatland.

The news doesn’t get any better. The department is also concerned the disease will continue to worsen due to the presence of protein prions in the environment, which can persist on the ground for years after an animal dies.

“As more and more prions get deposited, our ability to control this disease is going to become really constrained because then it's the environment driving the show, not animal to animal [contact],” he said.

Environmental exposure can occur when an animal comes into contact with contaminated soil, plants or hay, and contaminated surfaces such as mineral licks and carcasses.

“We know that these prions can persist in the environment for a very long time, at least 16 years,” Edwards said.

There was a time when scientists thought equilibrium for the disease would be somewhere between 30% and 50%, based on numbers with other wildlife diseases studied by the department. But news out of Canada has opened the eyes of department scientists to an even worse case scenario.



Prevalence rates among male mule deer in the South Saskatchewan River Valley are in the range of 85%. Females have a prevalence rate of 35%.

“We’ve seen a tenfold increase in infection rates in the last decade,” said Iga Stasiak, provincial wildlife health specialist with the Saskatchewan Ministry of Environment, in a recent press release.

To give the commissioners an idea of the impact of prevalence rates that high, Edwards said the number of deer dying per year from the disease is approximately half that of the prevalence rate (because the disease kills within about two years of infection). For example, the prevalence rate for CWD in the Greybull River herd is more than 40% for both mule deer and white-tailed bucks, meaning about 20% of the herd’s bucks will die each year at that rate.

The state’s highest prevalence rate is in hunt areas near Pavillion in Fremont County. The prevalence in mule deer bucks there reaches almost 65% and 24% in females. Rates are also concerning in the Upper Shoshone and Shoshone herd units near Powell and throughout the Bighorn Mountain range. Not enough samples were collected in the Clarks Fork herd to make a determination.

Cody Region Wildlife Management Coordinator Corey Class recently reported the Shoshone River herd in hunt areas 121 (west of Powell) and 122 (south and southwest of Powell) had a prevalence rate of about 45%.

Area elk herds with reported infections include the Cody Region and throughout the Bighorns. Rates for area elk infections are about the same for males and females, running about 5% or less, but the prevalence rate is about 11% in the Iron Mountain herd in southeast Wyoming.

CWD is a progressive disease that affects the brain, spinal cord, and many other tissues of farmed and free-ranging ungulates. The Centers for Disease Control suggests deer, elk and moose testing positive for CWD should not be consumed.
 
That article didn't age well. Iron mountain elk allegedly 11% prevalence. Last winter the GF pays 2 guys to shoot 129 elk, everyone of them tested for cwd.

Exactly 1 (one) tested positive.
Definitely good news but a terrible waste of the resource.
 
That article didn't age well. Iron mountain elk allegedly 11% prevalence. Last winter the GF pays 2 guys to shoot 129 elk, everyone of them tested for cwd.

Exactly 1 (one) tested positive.

Did that to the town mule deer around here. Had a suspected case of it here so they decided to eliminate the town deer and test them. Not a one tested positive. But I guess it’s not like mule deer numbers are hurting around here 🙄
 
That article didn't age well. Iron mountain elk allegedly 11% prevalence. Last winter the GF pays 2 guys to shoot 129 elk, everyone of them tested for cwd.

Exactly 1 (one) tested positive.
That bites. I love that herd. I always drive by the research center when I go to wheatland and watch the bulls feed on the hay by the highway.
 
“If they try to coerce me into allowing access according to some kind of incentive, that’s too close to socialism,” he said.

I really want to get a firm understanding of these types of mentalities, and I think I do, but I just doubt myself each time I read an article like this.
 
“If they try to coerce me into allowing access according to some kind of incentive, that’s too close to socialism,” he said.

I really want to get a firm understanding of these types of mentalities, and I think I do, but I just doubt myself each time I read an article like this.
He took over a million in farm subsidies with no issue, and pushes for transferable landowner tags.

It's hard to reconcile the "logic".
 
He took over a million in farm subsidies with no issue, and pushes for transferable landowner tags.

It's hard to reconcile the "logic".
Landowner tags should be irrelevant at this point since that unit offers unlimited this year, unless that changes this month. I’m sure that’ll solve all his issues.
 
It’s a rough situation I have watched Montana do it. Offering more tags only torches the public lands. Private access will never be forced and round and round we go. Kind of a sad future for hunting especially if cwd is what they say it is.
 
It’s a rough situation I have watched Montana do it. Offering more tags only torches the public lands. Private access will never be forced and round and round we go. Kind of a sad future for hunting especially if cwd is what they say it is.
That particular unit has a small chunk of public land, and the rest that is public is pretty much inaccessible. The rest are limited entry HMAs and private land. Super large unit. The unlimited tags for that unit was 100% geared towards landowners. “We’re in the business of killing elk and doing everything it takes” the biologist said to the public.

Edit: those unlimited tags are not valid on that small chunk of land.

How do we get in on it? Are more ranches joining the HMA?

HMA guy: “lol”

I’ll give them credit though, I believe they’re fighting like hell to get more ranches enrolled. You just get these ranches that don’t want strangers on their property. Or for Mr Reyes, he doesn’t want it to turn into socialism.
 
Last edited:
It’s a rough situation I have watched Montana do it. Offering more tags only torches the public lands. Private access will never be forced and round and round we go. Kind of a sad future for hunting especially if cwd is what they say it is.
The best CWD plan is going to have to take in to account landowner buy in. In other words you need to craft a plan that tailored to the access you have, not the access you wish you had.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
114,007
Messages
2,040,954
Members
36,428
Latest member
daddyryann
Back
Top