VikingsGuy
Well-known member
I agree for the most part, but other than nukes (which I acknowledge is a big reservation) Russia is not our peer. Their economy, corruption, leadership, and demographic trend puts them on a fairly clear downward path - a trajectory I might add that is at least one reason for this week's bad choices - a sick bear is a dangerous bear.This is real. They’re simply not a true peer competitor (in a conventional warfare sense) to the US or NATO. But they have done a damn good job of weakening western institutions without firing a shot.
Call me crazy, but the US political body spending more time bickering about zero-consequence cultural-war BS at the cost of achieving consensus on broader global geopolitical issues plays right into their hands.
To anyone who is on the fence about the future US role in global affairs needs to realize that we have two near-peer competitors in the world, China & Russia (though one could argue that the prior has become an actual peer competitor). Would you prefer rather have one of those two usurp the US as the global hegemon? Sure, we’re far from perfect here, but I believe we’ve still got the best thing going.
Sincerely,
Your resident kinda sorta neorealist
Simple Primer on Russian Hybrid Warfare
I fully agree about China and ironically we made them our peer. Shame on us.