JWP58
Banned
You don't get it. You truly don't. Bernie Sanders is a natural response to the failure of a free people to control themselves. If those who champion the idea of capitalism actually acted in accord with their principles, by accepting personal responsibility for their own actions (cost internalization) and exercising enlightened self-interest, ala Adam Smith, then there would not only be no Bernie Sanders, there would be no need for government.
As it is though, those who champion the idea of capitalism like to socialize their costs (to that extent *they* are socialists) and avail themselves of big government protection from having to take personal responsibility for their own actions (corporate limited liability). They think they can defy the laws of physics by pulling themselves up by their own boot straps and they are so ungrateful, inconsiderate, disrespectful and ignorant of fact, as to think they can be self-made men.
No one wants to be controlled except, possibly, through self control. However, while external efforts to control may manifest notwithstanding, it is clear that a failure to exercise self control will definitely engender those external efforts. A free people will inevitably bring attention to themselves.
The question then is this: If you were to be controlled, would you rather be controlled by “the people”, of which you are one, pursuant to democratic socialism and the leadership of folks like Bernie Sanders? Or would you rather be controlled by a political elite such as Hillary Clinton, Jeb Bush, et al, who are themselves controlled by those who champion the idea of capitalism but who are actually cost-externalizing, irresponsible socialists who parade around as risk-taking captains of daring-do?
So, it's democratic socialism (Sanders) or socialism (Bush/Hillary)?
Self control/people control, or external control by “them”?
Speaking of free, the "haves" bankers to which you refer have been getting free money since 2008 until the fed just raised the rate a paltry .25%. And yet you were charged how much to borrow that money? And all this after 8 years of Republicans ruined the world economy. It's taken 7 years to barely recover and it won't really happen for another 20 years or so, if then. The damage was next to permanent. And, to the extent Democrats are complicit, it's only because their cowardly asses (Hilary) went along with the Republicans for fear of being called "un-American" or "un-patriotic."
Sanders and Trump are the only possible way out of this mess and even then only if we clean House and Senate.
Ok I'll summarize your post..
Bankers=Bad
Corporations=Bad
Communism=Great
Yes compartmentalize your anger over the banker bailout and auto bailout (which I don't think anyone agreed with) by turning your anger toward "capitalism". And look to socialism...or communism light as the answer. Ok. Don't blame the crooks that allowed it to happen, blame the system they corrupted...ie crony capitalism.
That's fine. It worked for the USSR. Seems to be working for North Korea. All for the greater good. Because we all know.."you didn't build that, someone else did". I cant wait to hand over my money to subsidize some low life's income, bring on Bernie. I also cant wait to pay for some p.o.s.'s health care after they spent 50yrs treating their body like a dumpster.
I for one am glad to hear Trump come out and say he supports access to public land, and is against the transfer of that land to the state.