Yeti GOBOX Collection

Today marks ten years with the wolf

Elkhunter

New member
Joined
Dec 20, 2000
Messages
11,273
Location
Jackson, Wyoming
10 years later, Yellowstone wolf packs flourishing
Population numbers far exceed those predicted a decade ago.

By Rebecca Huntington

Eight gray wolves, packed in steel crates, rolled into Yellowstone National Park on this day in January a decade ago to howling crowds, reporters and schoolchildren gathered to witness the historic moment.

But the return of the predator, absent from the park for 50 years, faltered even as a horse trailer pulling the crated animals passed through the park's North Gate at 8:36 a.m. that morning.

The night before, when the wolves were en route, a federal court ordered the Canadian transplants remain crated, pending a legal challenge from Wyoming ranchers. The order kept biologists from opening the doors to the 2-foot-wide, 3-foot-high and 4-foot-long shipping containers, even to release the wolves into a 1-acre pen inside the park.

For wolf opponents, those eight containers represented a Pandora's box about to be unleashed on the region. Ranchers, sportsmen and others had predicted the predators would wreak havoc on livestock and wild ungulate herds prized by hunters. Wyoming's governor at the time warned of potential attacks on humans.

Now more than a decade later, such dire predictions have not come to pass. No attacks on humans have been documented. Moreover, conservationists say wolves have behaved surprisingly well, causing fewer problems than expected.

"I find it amazing that wolves have behaved as well as they have because of all of the fear mongering that was going on and still continues to go on," said Franz Camenzind, of the Jackson Hole Conservation Alliance.

The federal government also made predictions in a plan signed April 14, 1994, which set reintroduction in motion. Fourteen wolves were released in Yellowstone in 1995; the first eight spent less than a day in the shipping containers as a result of the court order. In 1996, biologists brought another 17 wolves to the park from Canada.

At the time, government biologists predicted relatively modest livestock conflicts, some reductions in hunter opportunity and economic benefits to the region from visitors coming to see wolves.

Even critics agree those predictions, particularly livestock losses, have not been far off the mark.

Full story: http://www.jhnewsandguide.com/Environmental.html
 
At the time, government biologists predicted relatively modest livestock conflicts, some reductions in hunter opportunity and economic benefits to the region from visitors coming to see wolves.
We were told in the public meeting that I attended, that there wouldn't be a measurable impact on hunting. Has anybody seen, or heard of, any economic gain from people coming to see wolves? :confused: :confused: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
 
I went to see them. Does that count? :D

3...2....1..... :MAD flame away ;)
 
Hey MO, how much did you spend on going to see wolves that you wouldn't have spent on the trip anyways? I look for them when I'm out, but I don't go to look for them. :D :D :p

:cool: flame on :MAD
 
I did especially go to the Lamar Valley area. I had never even considered going over that way before. I bought gas, we all (6 of us) ate breakfast up in that town (?), etc.

Just to be clear I am not especially pro-wolf. Personally I believe reintroduction of species is no different than causing extinctions in the first place. It is still man messing with nature. So the PETA types ought to be equally upset with the idea. Just another example of the double standard involved in "charitable" organizations.

They are cool to see though, I like wildlife photography, and well ya did ask. :D
 
Good for you MO. I have known of no one that makes specific trips to see wolves in the wild, until now. :rolleyes: I go wildlife watching, but I'm not looking for wolves specifically, more elk and moose then anything.
 
I too, went to Lamar Valley specifically to see the wolves. I wasn't really all that impressed. I could barely see them and it looked like a bunch of dogs walking around. Up close it may be an entirely different story.
 
As much as I did when I went down to specifically see the elk bugle in the fall. Prices were up a little from that time but not much.
 
Passing through the park after a successfull Cooke City goat hunt, I came across a pack of mutts putting a stalk on a group of bison near Slough Creek. It was pretty cool how the pack worked together. They worked the bison like a well trained army. I was rooting for the bison to kick some a of course. Didn't get to see the outcome, as I needed to get home and unpack from my hunt.

I also saw a couple of mutts chasing goats at 10,000 feet in June when I was scouting for goats just outside the Park. This was in 2000. These wolves have license to kill 24/7 365 days a year, and are good at it. They need to be managed when they leave the Park!

MattK,

Maybe those "little dogs" you saw were coyotes. That area still has a lot of coyotes.
 
This is going to be a problem until we get the wishy washy public out of the main part of the mix and let the people we hire to manage these things...... MANAGE....
 
BHR- Have you ever seen a black coyote. Me either. They were wolves. Besides from what I understand coyotes are good food for a wolf. I did see a coyote on a dead elk on my way but quite a ways from where the wolves were.
 
Actually....black coyotes are a bit more common than one would think...

capcoyote.jpg


capcoy4.jpg


capcoy1.jpg


...and no, the last guy isn't me :cool:
 
Paul :D your're right on that one too!

...hell, that couldn't have been me one the bear rug...would have meant that my ol' man would have to been sober enough someday to have hit the target :rolleyes:
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
113,621
Messages
2,027,080
Members
36,250
Latest member
Scared of Grizzly Bears
Back
Top