Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I never understand why you’d want to cut a barrel. There are advantages to a longer barrel and shortcomings to cutting it.
Yeah I’ve heard an ounce per inch is average. After spending all day researching rifles and comparisons I’m leaning towards the 7mm-08 and cutting it down to 20” as well as threading it. Not necessarily for weight savings but I want a shorter length so it’s easy to pack through brush. The 7-08 vs 6.5 comparison seems to be that the 6.5 can be better for long range shooting but 7-08 has better versatility for game and knockdown with still minimal recoil like the 6.5. Either should work well for what I need so I choose hunting versatility over long range plinking.I have heard rumors that the 6.5 Creedmoor might be a better killer than the 300 RUM
To the OP - I have a 6.5 CM Superlite. Mine is the left hand version with the shorter 22.4” barrel. Since the barrel is already skinny, I find it hard to believe that the flutes make the Superlite 4/10 of a pound lighter than the Lite. BTW - I saw a post on another thread that indicated that a 4” section cut from the end of a Tikka weighed 4 oz.
Quit making sense. mtmuleyDue to the Tikkas all being long actions, there is no advantage to a short action cartridge in one unless you are just going for lower recoil. In that case you can always load a long action caliber down for lower recoil.
I vote for the .270. You’d come out cheaper (no gunsmithing) and get more horsepower if needed.
Not much practical difference in .3mm (.13”) of bullet diameter, but some people go gaga over BC. I can’t shoot well enough over that long of a distance to gain an ounce of advantage from the small difference in BC between the two.
Due to the Tikkas all being long actions, there is no advantage to a short action cartridge in one unless you are just going for lower recoil. In that case you can always load a long action caliber down for lower recoil.
I vote for the .270. You’d come out cheaper (no gunsmithing) and get more horsepower if needed.
Not much practical difference in .3mm (.13”) of bullet diameter, but some people go gaga over BC. I can’t shoot well enough over that long of a distance to gain an ounce of advantage from the small difference in BC between the two.
Only about 300-400fps and a bigger bullet. LOLIn the end, all of the thought that went into this will be largely meaningless in terms of killing animals. Anyone that thinks there is any significant difference between shooting animals with a 6.5 and a .270 is delusional.
And before you buy/build, make sure you are comfortable with the amount of recoil those choices entail.I’m not the first or even the 100th but I’ve said it many times...pick a bullet you want to deliver, pick a speed you want to deliver it at to be effective, buy or build the rifle in a chambering to do that.
Only about 300-400fps and a bigger bullet. LOL
But I get what you're saying. A guy that is practiced and familiar, and knows what he's doing with a his rifle is deadly regardless. At least I guess that's what you're saying. Or maybe a .308 and a .338 RUM are the same and a zebra is a horse and a noun is an adverb.
And yet somehow less recoil and more COAL to work with are this crazy new idea...Right. 0.013” is a whopping difference. I’ll say it again. Anyone that thinks 0.013” and 300 FPS difference will make a significant difference in killing animals is delusional.
I have narrowed down my search for a lightweight backcountry rifle and have chosen a Tikka but I am looking at two different routes both in 6.5 CM. The Superlite is 5.9 lbs vs the Lite which is 6.3 lbs due to the fluting on the SL. Both are 24.3" barrels. I'm either going to get the Superlite or buy the Lite and cut down the barrel to 20" as I like a shorter barrel for packing and not snagging on brush. In thick brush a long rifle can be very frustrating. I understand you lose some velocity at far distances but I don't ever plan to shoot over 500, and rarely over 300. You will also cut weight to be similar to the SL.
Does anyone have experience with shortening a Tikka down? Which route would you chose, Tikka T3x Lite SS shortened to 20" barrel or Tikka T3x Superlite? Thanks for your input!