This is ironic

[JLS]

So, if "following" someone warrants getting kicked off the site, why is it even an option?

He got kicked off for being a vendor, and in violation of site rules.

R u goInG to FoLLOw mE?

 

[rtraverdavis]

I hit you with a follow too. That will make it easier for us to collude against those big city Portland type folks.

 

[MarvB]

Sums by volume? Why not add weight by the latitude and longitude by miles hiked. He must be a slacker.

He ain’t no @wllm1313 that fo sho!

 

[MarvB]

I thought followers are what I had after my bourbon, then I realized I was thinking chasers…probably why I don’t have followers

 

[OntarioHunter]

He got kicked off for being a vendor, and in violation of site rules.

R u goInG to FoLLOw mE?

10-4. Thanks for clarifying.

 

[RobertD]

I thought followers are what I had after my bourbon

I did too, but then my doctor said no, those are called "hallucinations"

 

[BackofBeyond]

View attachment 213691

Don’t worry they aren’t talking about you, Randy.

It’s those OTHER Portland type folks… ya, the other ones. Not your type, but the OTHER ones.
Pss

 

[ccc23454]

But now I don’t have as many followers,,,

I didnt even know you could follow and more importantly IGNORE...

 

[Deleted member 28227]

He ain’t no @wllm1313 that fo sho!

Yeah for the record I said we should be using a dunk tank to score antlers by volume 7 years ago.

 

[rtraverdavis]

Don’t worry they aren’t talking about you, Randy.

It’s those OTHER Portland type folks… ya, the other ones. Not your type, but the OTHER ones.
Pss

 

[mtmuley]

I didnt even know you could follow and more importantly IGNORE...

If you Ignore someone, you might miss out on some good stuff. My ignore list is zero. mtmuley

 

[MarvB]

Yeah for the record I said we should be using a dunk tank to score antlers by volume 7 years ago.

Nah you’d fubar B&C “attached” requirements, maybe the shooter goes in the dunk tank?

 

[RobertD]

Nah you’d fubar B&C “attached” requirements, maybe the shooter goes in the dunk tank?

Also, if you saw antlers off skullplate, you're foregoing accurate spread measurements between separate antlers; leave them on the skull plate and you have to be able to subtract skull plate volume from total volume, a number unique to each individual animal

Not to mention typical vs non typical is complicated, because if you compare volumes between two antlers a very nontypical deer could end up qualifying as typical

Volume seems like an interesting way to score antelope maybe but seems too complicated for most cervids

 

[JLS]

View attachment 213704
View attachment 213705

 

[noharleyyet]

Followers are what you dremel when your short mag won't feed...

 

[Deleted member 28227]

Nah you’d fubar B&C “attached” requirements, maybe the shooter goes in the dunk tank?

Skull goes in as well.

 

[JLS]

Skull goes in as well.

Brains in or out?

 

[Deleted member 28227]

Brains in or out?

Out to comply with CWD… it’s not rocket science. You measure the full dry clean skull with a bear or lion. Just make it same for ungulates. Toss the antlers in a big tank, take the measurement, it’s all gross score. Net is stupid anyway.

 

[JLS]

Out to comply with CWD… it’s not rocket science. You measure the full dry clean skull with a bear or lion. Just make it same for ungulates. Toss the antlers in a big tank, take the measurement, it’s all gross score. Net is stupid anyway.

 

[westbranch]

Yeah for the record I said we should be using a dunk tank to score antlers by volume 7 years ago.

My high school social studies teacher (now retired) has been saying this for 25 yrs at least. He is a big woods whitetail hunter in MN.