Irrelevant
Well-known member
TICKS! LOLWhy were moose tanking in the 90's prior to wolves?
I know because we were so arrogantly "aware" and "in control" then as well...
Any other excuses?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
TICKS! LOLWhy were moose tanking in the 90's prior to wolves?
I know because we were so arrogantly "aware" and "in control" then as well...
Any other excuses?
Nope, the wolves ate all the ticks...TICKS! LOL
So here's my comment about conservation.I bet the wolves eat until there's no food left then either die, or swim to the next land.
At least when humans are in control of a species, there is conservation involved.
I'm not patting anyone on the back. I'm saying current day, compared to wolves, humans wouldn't kill all the deer on the island. Conservation is involved. If conservation wasn't involved, there would be no interest in protecting a resource such as wild game.I think you're misconstruing controlling and impacting.
Your mistake was the comment about more conservationists, not as much with your subsequent arguments. "We conservationists" are by many measures rather worthless, spineless, and ineffective. We've failed miserably is most regards with only a handful of positive examples that we all point to and pat ourselves on the back.