You can argue my points all you want the fact is its not illegal to put food on your property and you can't prove why someone put the food there to convict them unless you make a law that its illegal to put food on your property. If you want that law then fine. I do not want that law.
Actually, in many places it is illegal to leave edible items out and accessible to wildlife.
Don't ruin a radical property rights ideology with facts.
But it’s what I do.
If she is subject then great, but it doesn't sound like she is getting in to much trouble.
So a garden is illegal?But it’s what I do.
Yea im a radical because when I buy a property I expect it to be mine to do with it what I please. Not the city, state, or federal govt to tell me what I can and can't do on it.
Furthermore I didnt say what she is doing is ok or ethical. I wouldn't do that. But she does have rights. Something I'm fairly certain you don't care about since more govt and laws is the answer to everything right?
Hmmm ... where have we heard that before. Is Ruby Ridge in Southeast Idaho?
Randy weaver had a bench warrant for failing to appear for firearms charges. Whats your point...cause I'm pretty sure not appearing in court is breaking the law. I could be wrong tho.
Nope, and my name is on several deeds in two counties, both of which have laws, regulations, and policies which somewhat differ. I respect and obey those for my own rights as well as for the rights of others and something called the "rights of the public". If those restrictions seem unfair, I study the when, why and wherefore and go to my elected representative with a reasonable argument to revise them. I don't just tell him or her I'll do what I want on my property and gubment and laws are bad.
I’m not going to engage in an argument with you since we mostly agree this lady is dumb. Read the ordinance. Those specifics are addressed. But they weren’t coming to her garden. She was placing attractants. And no, I expect at most she’ll receive a citation if that is the penalty in this case, as I said in my first post.
I do the same.
Pretty weak attempt at insult, but perhaps reflection of another negative bias.
The link wouldn't work. We agree on all of it. Except for maybe a little bit in which I explained above. Im not saying I'm right and your wrong or vice versus. Im just saying I don't agree with certain laws that infringe on a person's ability to use their property freely. I hate it when people are knuckleheads like the one in this example. I wish it didn't happen and people had common sense. Instead we have to make ordinances of all kinds to deal with these situations. It annoys me.
It was weak, but not everybody who doesn't like government speaks like they have no teeth like your typing would appear to imply.
'Don't know if that's an insult or not, but carry on.
It was not an insult directed at you or anyone else. You threw the insult at people you never met with your intentional misspelling.
