COEngineer
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2016
- Messages
- 1,513
The fact that the proposed changes (which would help avoid litigation) will probably be litigated to death is ironic.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hey Ben. Do you know what the original intent of the Forest in Focus program was?So essentially, this continues the kind of work that Forests in Focus does, which was passed under the 15 farm bill. Not a bad thing in and of itself, but the proof is in how this is administered, and excuse many of us if we have little faith in the band of brigands currently auctioning off our public lands.
So who is the Flathead-Lolo-Bitterroot Citizens Task Force?
Flathead, Bitterroot Lolo Citizen Task Force - Missoula, Montana
Montana Forest Plan - Flathead, Lolo, Bitterroot Citizen Task Force - Missoula, Montanamontanaforestplan.org
Hardly. A lot of time and money, both of which are in short supply, are being wasted playing this game. Just think how much good work could be accomplished if we could focus on just doing good work.So what your saying is the system works the way it was intended too?
+1 for Trump!
Trump Administration Seeking To Overhaul Forest Management Rules
The U.S. Forest Service is proposing changes to a landmark environmental law that would allow it to fast-track some forest management projects, including logging and prescribed burning.www.npr.org
I like this line in the NPR story...............
"But according to the government's own analysis — the last done in 2010 during the Obama administration — fewer than one-fifth of all timber and forest projects are appealed by citizens or environmental groups. "
Instead of relying on 2010 "analysis" maybe they should look into current timber and forest projects under appeal......... in Montana National Forests alone.