3855WIN
Well-known member
You’ve never seen Rushmore, yet it’s an eyesore. Hmm.While I can appreciate the art involved in statue's the whole idea of statues, in particular those "honoring" a person are about as ridiculous as it gets.
There isn't a single person that learns jack chit about history from looking at a statue. You learn history, by studying history, by understanding history. A statue doesn't tell the story or explain history one bit.
IMO, mount Rushmore is an eyesore, I'd rather it was in its natural state, the wildlife probably would as well. Never have seen it in person, probably never will, and don't care if I don't.
Monuments are a bit different, IMO, because they usually have some interpretive stuff to accompany them...a story to tell, you know actually history rather than glorifying a person. If I were to never see another statue of a person again, I wouldn't be out anything.
Agree in a lot of ways. Statues and cemetery tombstones are from a different time. Doesn’t mean it all needs to be destroyed. Rome is like walking through a history book. Should it’s statues and coliseum be destroyed?