Irrelevant
Well-known member
The Masshole?The what?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Masshole?The what?
I miss that guy. Nice kid for an O&G shill.The Masshole?
Ok, so in WY state average for deer positive was 18.3 or something up from 17.1.I would give you replacement tag.
I'm in the camp of it tests positive That's a risk you took going into the drawing.Ok, so in WY state average for deer positive was 18.3 or something up from 17.1.
So if you get a positive test and another tag that takes 18% of tags out of the equation or would it be untop of the capper NR tags sold?
Here in WI if you shoot a deer get it tested and it's positive. You get to keep everything and you get another either sex tag. I know of guys out shooting doe knowing very high likelihood of positive test. Than they get a buck tag good for this season and next.
It will get real interesting imo if/when tags are getting reissued for positive tests. You think point creep is bad now.
I'm in this camp too as well as the ignorance is bliss in regards to testing. If the animal appears health meat looks good it's getting eaten not tested. Unless mandatory obviouslyI'm in the camp of it tests positive That's a risk you took going into the drawing.
Gun season is mandatory here, which I've got zero problem with. (How they manage after the data is a different story). Never had one tested during archery as long as they appear healthy. And I am in the "hot zone".I'm in this camp too as well as the ignorance is bliss in regards to testing. If the animal appears health meat looks good it's getting eaten not tested. Unless mandatory obviously
I wasn't putting that much energy into it, but I'll play.Ok, so in WY state average for deer positive was 18.3 or something up from 17.1.
So if you get a positive test and another tag that takes 18% of tags out of the equation or would it be untop of the capper NR tags sold?
Here in WI if you shoot a deer get it tested and it's positive. You get to keep everything and you get another either sex tag. I know of guys out shooting doe knowing very high likelihood of positive test. Than they get a buck tag good for this season and next.
It will get real interesting imo if/when tags are getting reissued for positive tests. You think point creep is bad now.
Originally published 2 yrs ago. Wonder what more they know nowWe may be closer to answers on transmisability.
New study reveals mechanism for how disease-spreading prions can jump from one species to another
Finding suggests transmission between species may be possible In a new study, researchers from Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine have identified the structure of protein fibrils linked to a hereditary form of human prion disease. This insight, they say, reveals the mechanism...thedaily.case.edu
Actually looks like you can contact him. If I were a game biologist I would, but I'm not all that knowledgable about CWD, although I know a lot about prions. Friends of mine did research on them, and one worked in the lab with the guy when he discovered them.Originally published 2 yrs ago. Wonder what more they know now
A friend of mine's grandmother died of CJD. She never at venison.A good friend from northern Wyoming died from Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease after eating CWD-infected venison. It's a horrible way to die. Because I live where CWD is present in the mule deer population, I see no reason not to get my deer tested by the G&F before consuming. It needs to hang at least a week anyway: about the time it takes to get the test results back.
Yeah, but eating deer caused the tractor to flip over on him, don't ya know?Here in Pa we have CWD in some areas. One of my old hunting partners lived in such an area, and ate LOTS of deer he shot there
He passed this year, but the cause was a tractor that overturned on him......not an infected deer on his dinner plate. IMO this is just another attempt to put a stop to deer hunting and nothing more.
I would take the asteroid over the torture of playing golf.I'm right there with you on hating the idea of wasting meat. I decided long ago after doing my own research that I'm not throwing any deer out. I will continue to practice what I was tought growing up if the deer appears healthy in life and everything looks good when cutting it up it's getting eaten.
Your above thought really sums it up for me. If I had to throw my deer out I'd take up bird hunting or maybe golf. OK well not golf but you get it. Pretty sure my family being the epicenter of cwd transfer from eating a couple positive deer is about as likely as a astroid landing on our house while we all sleep.
Yeah, but please note that this is written referring to HUMAN prion disease.We may be closer to answers on transmisability.
New study reveals mechanism for how disease-spreading prions can jump from one species to another
Finding suggests transmission between species may be possible In a new study, researchers from Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine have identified the structure of protein fibrils linked to a hereditary form of human prion disease. This insight, they say, reveals the mechanism...thedaily.case.edu
Stop using logic when there's fear to be spread!How do we manage Mad Cow? With testing, to be sure. But we do not test every beef cow butchered for MCD. We do not allow the butchering of "downers", meaning obviously unhealthy animals.
There a is corollary for hunters. Don't shoot obviously unhealthy animals. I would say odds of getting prion disease from deer are about the same as the rest of the population getting prion disease after eating commercially raised beef. Better in fact, since there are no proven human cases from venison. No matter what the so called study says. So out of all the beef consumed around the globe, how many human MCD cases are there? I do not know the number, but it is minuscule. The comparison to MCD in humans and CWD in humans is very nearly dividing by zero.
We should be talking about how any periodical can consider the cited paper a "study". It is merely a few researchers alerting their colleagues of a possible correlation. Presumably to make them aware should they be presented with new cases. That the author of the story and the editors of Field and Stream consider this a study says more about them. Instagram Science.
Next week - Trophic Cascade.