TheJason
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2024
- Messages
- 18,601
I aim for where the femur and clavicle meet.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are too kind.You sure about this?
You are too kind.
The cow I shot in the neck last year was so floppy I could barely keep the game bags on my pack for the pack out.
Maybe this?
Cadaveric spasm - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
That bull shoulda been dead. The one I killed, 181 Hammer at damn near 3400fps. Not much bloodshot. I grind the neck anyway. mtmuleyHow much bloodshot loss was there?
I asked the question because I was hunting with a friend last fall, and we had a raghorn at 60 yards in the timber with the vitals covered and neck exposed. Buddy had won the rock-paper-scissors at the truck for first shot, and he waited for the vitals to get exposed instead of a neck shot. We didn't get the elk, and I've been second-guessing our decision making ever since (and why in the world I decided to throw rock instead of scissors).
Head and neck. Big difference. mtmuleyNothing like blowing off a jaw to conserve meat....
Head shots are a no go for me.
Right there with you. Seen one without a jaw. What a way to goNothing like blowing off a jaw to conserve meat....
Head shots are a no go for me.
Yep. I agree. A bigger target on the neck and if you hit high or low a better chance of survival on a graze. I still prefer the lungs but will shoot a neck shot with a steady rest and short distance if it is the only option.Head and neck. Big difference. mtmuley
Critters with a bullet through the lungs die. I shot that bull last year at the base of the neck only because I wanted him dead where he stood. The way downhill he may have gone was scary. mtmuleyYep. I agree. A bigger target on the neck and if you hit high or low a better chance of survival on a graze. I still prefer the lungs but will shoot a neck shot with a steady rest and short distance if it is the only option.
I watched a tv hunting show where they came across a bull elk standing next to the road. It didn't spook and you could tell something was wrong with it but it still looked healthy.Saw my father in law drop a bull at 400 yards with the Texas method looked like he had 8 livers when I gutted him. Perfect shot hit the heart no gut shot dropped in seconds.
I am new to wanting to hunt and have been studying how to hunt ETHICALLY. I want the meat and want to target large bodied animals. I want to save as much meat as possible, and am thinking head and neck shots will do that, best. Everyone I watch says those shots are unethical, but never give a reason. I see it as the most ethical shot possible, as the animal dies quickly. So, what an I not seeing?I have always hunted to put meat in the freezer 1st and to kill a trophy second. I will hunt a few days turning down smaller bucks or bulls if I have the time but I have no problem filling an any elk or deer tag with a doe/cow or small male of either. That is also why I never if possible have taken a shoulder shot first. Placing it low in the heart and lungs seems to work for me and the level of blood shot meat decreases greatly. I have shot lots of animals in the head and neck when I have very good situation. I just have trouble understanding how most people preach the shoulder shot as the only way to place your shot.. If have respect for the animal and what it gives us, should we not what to be able to harvest as much as possible?
I am new to wanting to hunt and have been studying how to hunt ETHICALLY. I want the meat and want to target large bodied animals. I want to save as much meat as possible, and am thinking head and neck shots will do that, best. Everyone I watch says those shots are unethical, but never give a reason. I see it as the most ethical shot possible, as the animal dies quickly. So, what an I not seeing?
Because stuff happens. If those shots are slightly off, then you are a long ways from a clean, quick kill.I am new to wanting to hunt and have been studying how to hunt ETHICALLY. I want the meat and want to target large bodied animals. I want to save as much meat as possible, and am thinking head and neck shots will do that, best. Everyone I watch says those shots are unethical, but never give a reason. I see it as the most ethical shot possible, as the animal dies quickly. So, what an I not seeing?
The shot that saves the most meat is about 2" behind the shoulder 1/3 to 1/2 way up broadside without doubt.I am new to wanting to hunt and have been studying how to hunt ETHICALLY. I want the meat and want to target large bodied animals. I want to save as much meat as possible, and am thinking head and neck shots will do that, best. Everyone I watch says those shots are unethical, but never give a reason. I see it as the most ethical shot possible, as the animal dies quickly. So, what an I not seeing?