Shooter lose millions of acres - where are the gun groups?

Big Fin

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2000
Messages
16,843
Location
Bozeman, MT
In our 4th of 5 episodes in the idea of handing Federal lands to State Land Boards, we talk about the impact on recreational shooting. Rec shooters stand to lose more than most any other group, yet not a peep from the groups claiming to represent gun owners and shooters. They can't say they don't know, as I've provided the facts to leadership levels of all those groups.

And when shooters lose, so does conservation. More than 70% of Pittman-Robertson funding comes from shooters who are not hunting. Anyhow, here's another dive into the topic of why we need to focus on improving Federal land management and reject the idea of giving those lands away.

 
Buzz said it well somewhere else - if these states were at least semi serious about maintaining your right to recreate on public land, they would "cut the red tape" on existing state owned lands.

Chaps me that NSSF, GOA, and the NRA arent saying anything about the potential loss of recreational shooting on public land.

Not sure - but seems like MOST nrl/long range rifle shoots would no longer even be an option.
 
Man, shooters need to pick up their garbage and brass. I don’t care what you shoot nor how much but pick it up…
What exactly does this have to do with handing federal lands to state land boards? Isn’t there some rule about keeping threads on topic?
 
What exactly does this have to do with handing federal lands to state land boards? Isn’t there some rule about keeping threads on topic?
I think his point might have been how the trash produced doesn’t do anything to garner support for shooting on our lands and might actually cause some people to see it as a good thing.
He’s right.
 
Ollin Magnetic Digiscoping Systems

Forum statistics

Threads
114,627
Messages
2,065,247
Members
36,680
Latest member
priscillavelez095
Back
Top