SwaggyD
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2022
- Messages
- 1,743
This isn’t kind of disgusting, it needs to stop.Or the guys at the bar that talk about feeding all the birds to their dogs to stay under possession. It’s kind of disgusting, honestly.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This isn’t kind of disgusting, it needs to stop.Or the guys at the bar that talk about feeding all the birds to their dogs to stay under possession. It’s kind of disgusting, honestly.
How so?Section 2 and 4 seem to contradict each other.
But the 70 sharpies and 200 pheasant guys are already illegal, no?After hearing stories from wardens the last few years like the guy picked up with 70 sharptails in his trailer, and a couple other guys with 200 pheasants getting pinched, it really does start to sway my feelings towards some limits on hunting days. For years the gal at one local cafe told us about the guys that came and left bags of birds in her walk-in so they could keep hunting. Or the guys at the bar that talk about feeding all the birds to their dogs to stay under possession. It’s kind of disgusting, honestly. If this puts a stop to, or at least reduces that kind of behavior, I can’t say I hate it.
I have a hard time believing the trucks you see out almost every day for two months straight are staying under possession.
there illegal because they been pounding everything for a month or more, with multiple dog stringsBut the 70 sharpies and 200 pheasant guys are already illegal, no?
game give aways have been going on for a long time. Many are promoted by state DNR/G&Fs - "feed the hungry", food banks, etc.. Why not make game give aways illegal.
I suspect this type of thing is pretty minor with respect to bird hunters. At least upland hunters.
But it sounds like enforcement is, indeed, the issue. And, it sounds a lot like gun control. Make a lot of new laws that inhibit lawful people while people that broke the old gun laws also break the new ones. The only people really affected are the legal average joes and janes.there illegal because they been pounding everything for a month or more, with multiple dog strings
any idea how many trainers show up with hundreds of dogs in june, july. train till sept. and kill birds for 2 months solid
i watch numerous guys showing up in that time frame yearly
give em 14 days then let them go to another state
enforcement is another can of worms,,,,we dont need to.open in this thread
Seems like the last thing any western state wants to do is admit that in 2023 they have in some cases double the resident population they did in 2006.Somebody shared this on the Facebook. How big of a goofball is Rhonda Knudsen?
View attachment 266968
I feel bad for non-resident hunters. They seem to be taking a beating across the west. I have close friends who are non-resident hunters. All that said, when it comes down to it, non-residents should lose opportunity before residents do.
We have much bigger fish to fry than what this bill will solely alleviate, but it’s a step in the right direction from what I have seen in the field and the trajectory of nonresident hunting pressure across Montana over the last couple decades.
The second group, I do not know nearly as much about. But they do not have the same draw to leave as August ends and September begins. I could certainly see where they might stay, to hunt the dogs. This might be where the rub is.
I feel like this used to be a minor thing but is becoming increasingly common or egregious. You never used to see another upland hunter in September, at all, let alone people grossly over bagging on sharptails. But I fully accept that my gut reaction is probably an overreaction, or at least misdirected. I guess for me personally, that level of disregard for the resource makes me feel like perhaps there is too much opportunity being provided.But the 70 sharpies and 200 pheasant guys are already illegal, no?
game give aways have been going on for a long time. Many are promoted by state DNR/G&Fs - "feed the hungry", food banks, etc.. Why not make game give aways illegal.
I suspect this type of thing is pretty minor with respect to bird hunters. At least upland hunters.
I would say absolutely with regards to big game. But birds in my experience draw a much different crowd, at least in this part of the world, and it is predominantly non-resident in the upland hot spots of Montana and North Dakota. But having worked now in adjacent areas in both states, the pressure, while still high at times, seems better-managed or distributed temporally in North Dakota with the limited licenses.Seems like the last thing any western state wants to do is admit that in 2023 they have in some cases double the resident population they did in 2006.
Those residents who get 70+% of the tags for whatever critter are the issue.
I know about them, as I live in one of the main areas they come up from. They like having a place to work dogs without the oppressive late summer heat and humidity. Plus there's more public to spread out on (theorerically). I'm sure plenty stay for four, six, eight weeks working dogs before coming back down as upland season begins down here.
Reverse is true too, lots of MN tags with dog trailers and boxes down here in late winter.
I’ve seen similar thoughts with regards to big game hunting; start of the season everyone hates NR, then it becomes people from out of county and by the end of the season it’s people from the wrong town in the countySomebody shared this on the Facebook. How big of a goofball is Rhonda Knudsen?
View attachment 266968
I feel bad for non-resident hunters. They seem to be taking a beating across the west. I have close friends who are non-resident hunters. All that said, when it comes down to it, non-residents should lose opportunity before residents do.
We have much bigger fish to fry than what this bill will solely alleviate, but it’s a step in the right direction from what I have seen in the field and the trajectory of nonresident hunting pressure across Montana over the last couple decades.
Would only targeting commercial training operations be a better option then?The retired guys with RV and a dog or two don’t bother me too much. The dog trainers with dog trailer spending the entire season training certainly do.
I know about them, as I live in one of the main areas they come up from. They like having a place to work dogs without the oppressive late summer heat and humidity. Plus there's more public to spread out on (theorerically). I'm sure plenty stay for four, six, eight weeks working dogs before coming back down as upland season begins down here.
Reverse is true too, lots of MN tags with dog trailers and boxes down here in late winter.