Whiskers,
Your logic escapes me.
Your premise is that this country is experiencing a rapid decline in personal responsibility. With this I whole heartedly agree.
What I do not understand is how the decline of personal responsibility has anything to do with gay marriage.
It seems to me that marriage is all about commitment and responsibility, isn't it?
Gays are often critisized because of their percieved promiscuity and now they are being critisized because they want to be able to legally commit to a life long partner.
I am honestly not sure where I land in this debate. I would probably leave it up to the individual states to decide whether to recognize it and also to decide whether there should be reciprocity in recognition. I don't know how I would treat it from a federal perspective.
Your logic escapes me.
Your premise is that this country is experiencing a rapid decline in personal responsibility. With this I whole heartedly agree.
What I do not understand is how the decline of personal responsibility has anything to do with gay marriage.
It seems to me that marriage is all about commitment and responsibility, isn't it?
Gays are often critisized because of their percieved promiscuity and now they are being critisized because they want to be able to legally commit to a life long partner.
I am honestly not sure where I land in this debate. I would probably leave it up to the individual states to decide whether to recognize it and also to decide whether there should be reciprocity in recognition. I don't know how I would treat it from a federal perspective.