PSA - New Sig Sauer Zulu6 HDX Pro's Are Trash

C

Chingon

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 3, 2021
Messages
211
Cross-posting here for awareness. I love my Gen 2 HDX 16's and jumped at the chance to give Sig more of my money on the 18 pro's. They are objectively worse at clarity, size, weight, batteries, stabilization... Sig only stands behind their "low light performance improvement".

This new gen is great way to lose money and gain frustration. If you do buy them just make sure to never look through the better and cheaper Gen 2's.

Zulu6 Pro 50 vs Kite APC 50

Has anyone had a chance to do any side by side comparisons with the new Sig Zulu6 hdx Pro 50mm OIS? Perhaps compared with the Kite APC 50 or even the previous model Zulu6 HDX 16x42, or Canon 15x50? I currently have a Zulu6 HDX 10x30 and 16x42. I had a chance to pit them against my Meopta...
rokslide.com rokslide.com

New Sig Zulu

You may want to hang on to those 10x. I absolutely love mine. The 20's are OK. In a more perfect world I think I would have the 10's on my chest and the new Sawro 14's for tripod use but I am OK with where I am at. Yeah I really want to try some ranging binos instead of the 10s but it’s...
rokslide.com rokslide.com
 
I think you could make the argument that for the $ they aren't worth the extra $500 over the 42s but to say they are trash is wild. I had a chance to hunt behind the 16 pros for a week and the omniscan was incredible. Better light transmission and improved color with the 50mm objective and new coatings. I never reached for my swaros or my spotter the entire week. Eye of the beholder I guess.
 
Edwin said:
I think you could make the argument that for the $ they aren't worth the extra $500 over the 42s but to say they are trash is wild. I had a chance to hunt behind the 16 pros for a week and the omniscan was incredible. Better light transmission and improved color with the 50mm objective and new coatings. I never reached for my swaros or my spotter the entire week. Eye of the beholder I guess.
Click to expand...
Thanks for the input, but did you actually run the Pro's side by side with 42's? I'm guessing you didn't. If so, please post up some pictures of the images to show an improvement.

For someone that hasn't used the 42's, or isn't looking through them side by side, they might seem pretty great. However, the idea of paying $500 extra for bigger, heavier, more battery hungry, LESS CLEAR glass is straight trash. Sorry, but that simply doesn't compute. Once Sig sends my 18's back I'll do a low light test off tripods to show that comparison. But to pay all that money and carry all that extra bulk for marginal performance improvement for only 5 min of the day? Epic fail.
 
I sold my 42s to make room for the 50s. We did have them side by side. Both 16s. I'm used to the omniscan now so it would be hard to go back to the 42s. Battery life was just fine I've been playing with them since launch week and they are still on the original batteries. Maybe the 18s are less forgiving?? Anyone have a chance to use the 14 pros yet?
 
Sorry - my data is buried in my cross post. Key points:

  • I've had my 16x42's for about a year and love them, ranted and raved. Excited about the improved glass advertised by Sig. Pre-ordered the 18 Pro's.
  • Received them and took them out, along with 16's, to do some glassing. Huh, not blown away despite the extra heft and supposedly improved glass.
  • Glass up some elk at about 2,000 yds. That's odd - I can count the points on the bull with my 16's but not my 18's. Must be because I haven't dialed in diopters or something? I was very steady off my tailgate as well.
  • Head to the range with my tripod. Dial in diopter for 18's, take the above photos getting each as focused as possible. 16's are clearly superior. What the heck?
  • Called Sig and they wanted proof that 18's were not better for an RMA - sent them these images and they sent a label (apparently that convinced them something wasn't right).
  • They call back and say, "These meet spec, go pound sand, thanks for your cash you moron." (paraphrasing)
Another guy on Rokslide did a similar comparison with the 16's side by side and is reporting similar decrease in performance, though no pics.

Sig advertising:
The ZULU6-HDX PRO Image Stabilized Binoculars set a new standard in optical clarity and stabilization with reengineered lens coatings, prescriptions, and settings that are built to impress even the most discerning optics aficionados.
Click to expand...

To me, that's a slap in face to consumers. Stand behind your ads and your products.
 
perma said:
Interesting, I see a field of view difference but the magnification difference seems nonexistent. How strange.
Click to expand...
Nothing about them were as expected. The rep from Sig told me that with larger objectives, one should expect less clarity. WTF
 
Chingon said:
The rep from Sig told me that with larger objectives, one should expect less clarity. WTF
Click to expand...
That's an interesting comment too. I can maybe see how too much light coming in can distort the image but I have a pair of 12x50 Razor UHD's that are pretty damn clear. Just seems like they're out of focus, like a focus wheel or diopter adjustment.

I was thinking about getting a pair of these too....
 
MTLabrador said:
Man if you’re already spending that kind of money I would have a hard time buying anything other than Swarovski ELs or SLCs. I still refuse to look through a pair of NLs because I don’t want to be tempted to cheat on my SLCs.
Click to expand...
Buddy of mine just got nl’s. I’m scared to look through them. I love my slc’s
 
MTLabrador said:
Man if you’re already spending that kind of money I would have a hard time buying anything other than Swarovski ELs or SLCs. I still refuse to look through a pair of NLs because I don’t want to be tempted to cheat on my SLCs.
Click to expand...
My hunting partner has Swaro BTX and the new NL’s. Unless we’re glassing a single spot for more than an hour, I have zero desire to use traditional “alpha” glass anymore. The gen 2 are just that quick and easy to deploy that I have no desire to constantly lug around tripods and take 5 minutes to get set up before I’m glassing.
 
Got my 18x50 HDX Pro's back from Sig with a note that they're amazing and I'm an idiot. Grabbed another set of 18x50 HDX Pro's from Sportsman's, as well as the new 16x50 HDX Pro's to compare against my 16x42's.

Bottom line - only the 18x50 pair that I got from Sportsman's could be imagined to be slightly better optically if you try really really hard. You get MAYBE two minutes more glassing time when it's dark. The difference between 18x50's was noticeable and repeatable. I could mix them up and pick which one was which based on image clarity. Sig must have pretty loose specs for their QC. The 16x50's were atrociously bad. Holy cow.

Save your money - don't buy the HDX Pro's.

Sig Sauer 16x42 Zulu6 HDX:
16_42_3.jpeg

Sig Sauer 16x50 Zulu6 HDX Pro
16_50_2.jpeg

Sig Sauer 18x50 Zulu6 HDX Pro #1
CL18_50_11.jpeg

Sig Sauer 18x50 Zulu6 HDX Pro #2
SW18_50_6.jpeg

These were taken during sunset, so the color isn't something that can be compared. I wanted to stick around until sunset to test the low light performance. No pics of that, but there was a very small improvement after last light. Not a $700 improvement for sure.
 
MTLabrador said:
Man if you’re already spending that kind of money I would have a hard time buying anything other than Swarovski ELs or SLCs. I still refuse to look through a pair of NLs because I don’t want to be tempted to cheat on my SLCs.
Click to expand...
I think the NL are on sale for a few more days ;) just do it! i did and although the price stopped my heart for a few seconds. They are so worth it!!
 
perma said:
That's an interesting comment too. I can maybe see how too much light coming in can distort the image but I have a pair of 12x50 Razor UHD's that are pretty damn clear. Just seems like they're out of focus, like a focus wheel or diopter adjustment.

I was thinking about getting a pair of these too....
Click to expand...
That doesn't make sense in any application i've seen. Bigger spotters in the same lineup are always revered for better better optics. Don't know how image stabilization would impact that.

I've yet to try these.. Just got the darn Kilo 10k G2s so hate to spend more $ on binos.
 
Rie Bread said:
Has anyone used the 12x42’s?
Click to expand...
Not outside the store but they are nice. Most go with the 16s as they have the same advertised field of view as the 12s, but the 12s definitely seemed just a bit more forgiving and very pleasant to look through. If I went back to the hdx I would strongly consider the 12s for an all around bow hunting bino very easy to quickly deploy for one handed glassing.
 
Edwin said:
Not outside the store but they are nice. Most go with the 16s as they have the same advertised field of view as the 12s, but the 12s definitely seemed just a bit more forgiving and very pleasant to look through. If I went back to the hdx I would strongly consider the 12s for an all around bow hunting bino very easy to quickly deploy for one handed glassing.
Click to expand...
They seem light weight compared to others
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

NWmontanaOutdoors
WTS Sig Zulu6 HDX PRO 16x
Replies
1
Views
332
CoHunter1991
CoHunter1991

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
114,007
Messages
2,040,943
Members
36,428
Latest member
daddyryann

Share this page

Back
Top