VikingsGuy
Well-known member
Rural areas consistently pay in less taxes than funding they get back. If costal libs cared about money they would kick them out willingly.I doubt the costal libs will let it happen, they always want more tax money.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Rural areas consistently pay in less taxes than funding they get back. If costal libs cared about money they would kick them out willingly.I doubt the costal libs will let it happen, they always want more tax money.
Wow - that has to smart - even Idaho doesn’t want themSigh. Idaho is a poor state. Our school systems are ranked 50 out of 50 in funding.
Last thing we need is Oregonians further placing pressure on our infrastructure. We can’t afford to help you. Stay home.
Maybe Idaho just wants to save some room for the Californians?Wow - that has to smart - even Idaho doesn’t want them
I'm all for it, I hope they split California into 5-6 states or whatever was on the table a while back too. I also hope to witness the giant earthquake that either drops the West Coast into the pacific or turns it into an island, they taught about it in school when I was a kid, and if I don't see it before I die I will be sorely disappointed in my teachers.
I wish greater Minnesota would secede from the twin cities...
Do you also root for the rapid coming of the inevitable explosion of the Yellowstone cauldron that will wipe out the mountain states?I'm all for it, I hope they split California into 5-6 states or whatever was on the table a while back too. I also hope to witness the giant earthquake that either drops the West Coast into the pacific or turns it into an island, they taught about it in school when I was a kid, and if I don't see it before I die I will be sorely disappointed in my teachers.
Do you also root for the rapid coming of the inevitable explosion of the Yellowstone cauldron that will wipe out the mountain states?
Oh definitely, I'd love for the doomsayers to get a win, I'm a 'root for the underdog' kind of guy and I feel bad for them.
Geez man, I hope in 2019 you weren't also rooting for an international viruslab leakoutbreak from "raccoon dogs" lol
The gallatin valley “reclaimed”. Greatest environmental success story of our time!!!Oh definitely, I'd love for the doomsayers to get a win, I'm a 'root for the underdog' kind of guy and I feel bad for them.
Not that I’m rooting for more Californians but it’s an Apple and Orange situation.Maybe Idaho just wants to save some room for the Californians?
Californian buys a house here and pays taxes. Good. No money out of my pocket.
In terms of presidential and senate politics, I think we'll be there regardless, in another 10-20 years. It's hard to see Texas staying red for too much longer.Imagine this scenario: The rest of the USA allows only Texas to secede. Instantly the national politics get much bluer.
I assume you support free markets, democracy, freedom of movement of all citizens, and free movement of capital. If so, such is the nature of affairs.Increased demand in real estate means increased prices. Some members had quite the lively debate about ski resort towns in Colorado and how people swooped in and made it unaffordable for locals.
Eventually increased real estate price increases the valuation at the state/county assessor's office. This results in increased property taxes, which is good and bad -- more taxes for things like schools.
If enough certain "Californians" show up in Idaho, your state turns purple, then maybe blue. Then your taxes get raised, anyway and you're paying for more social services that are perceived to be "required".
At least, that's how a lot of this happened in Oregon. Someone in S. California sells their modest 2000 square foot house for $1 mil, then buys a bigger, better house in Oregon for half the price. Eventually property taxes go up and up, and "new" voters vote for more and more "taxes".
It is not clear that in 20 yrs the party lines will even remain the same. The current GOP is not the GOP of 1980 and the DEMs are not the DEMS of 1960. Party alignment is ever shifting.In terms of presidential and senate politics, I think we'll be there regardless, in another 10-20 years. It's hard to see Texas staying red for too much longer.
Agreed and good point. Part of me thinks that all it would take would be the more centrist portion of the GOP leaving, to peel off some moderate democrats and completely blow the system off kilter.It is not clear that in 20 yrs the party lines will even remain the same. The current GOP is not the GOP of 1980 and the DEMs are not the DEMS of 1960. Party alignment is ever shifting.
I assume you support free markets, democracy, freedom of movement of all citizens, and free movement of capital. If so, such is the nature of affairs.
Huh? I assume part of the reason lot of people leave california is they want lower taxes. You are arguing they vote in higher taxes in their new locations? I would need some data showing that to be the case, because it seems unlikely.Eventually property taxes go up and up, and "new" voters vote for more and more "taxes".
It’s still a huge variance between supporting Oregon and having Californians live here.Correct, I was pointing out how the free market (as modified) works. There are tangible and intangible costs (and benefits), though some costs are only realized a lot farther downstream.