"Now it's my turn!" -Federal circa 2025

[WVTXn]

So I guess the question is…
Does this innovation justify the expense?
Well that depends more on the individual not so much the innovation.
If, let’s say a plurality of individuals (adequate market share), buy enough rifles in this chamber….then it is here to stay.

Just my guess. I’d like to shoot one for sure. But I don’t need to buy it,
Yet

 

[Wind Gypsy]

Do the Rokslide guys have a woody for this? mtmuley

Seems to be poo pooed there and elsewhere more than here even.

 

[mtmuley]

Seems to be poo pooed there and elsewhere more than here even.

Surprising. Too big probly. mtmuley

 

[Elky Welky]

Does this innovation justify the expense?

They're testing it in the civilian market but this innovation was requested at the behest of the military, which gives it a very good chance of sticking around regardless of if the hunting community is willing to give up their '06s and .308s (cartridges that also started their lives as military rounds).

Big Caveat* IF the military adopts this. Currently the .277 Fury still has legs in that application. This was a good read today: https://mdttac.com/blog/7mm-backcountry-a-promising-caliber-with-potential-pitfalls/

 

[Wind Gypsy]

Now it's getting interesting.. 556 loaded in the steel casings with similar velocity increases. What's next?

 

[Wind Gypsy]

They're testing it in the civilian market but this innovation was requested at the behest of the military, which gives it a very good chance of sticking around regardless of if the hunting community is willing to give up their '06s and .308s (cartridges that also started their lives as military rounds).

Big Caveat* IF the military adopts this. Currently the .277 Fury still has legs in that application. This was a good read today: https://mdttac.com/blog/7mm-backcountry-a-promising-caliber-with-potential-pitfalls/

IMO, People have been putting WAY too much emphasis on military weapons solicitations recently. 277 fury won some competition and people are acting like its going to replace 556 nato across the military.. I'm curious if any soldiers are actually fielding that fury round now years later? 300 Norma got selected for some select unit's sniper rifles so people start saying 300 WM is out, norma is the future! Then some other group orders some sniper rifles in 300 PRC and rubes are exclaiming the 300 norma is dead cuz someone ordered 300 PRC.

It just seems like weapons have come so far with the number of options that its not going to ever be standardized again like it was when everything was 30-06 rifles and 45 pistols and SMGs or even the past 60 years with 556 has ruled most battle rifles.

6.5 Creedmoor is winning some contracts as well now.

 

[ismith]

IMO, People have been putting WAY too much emphasis on military weapons solicitations recently. 277 fury won some competition and people are acting like its going to replace 556 nato across the military.. I'm curious if any soldiers are actually fielding that fury round now years later? 300 Norma got selected for some select unit's sniper rifles so people start saying 300 WM is out, norma is the future! Then some other group orders some sniper rifles in 300 PRC and rubes are exclaiming the 300 norma is dead cuz someone ordered 300 PRC.

It just seems like weapons have come so far with the number of options that its not going to ever be standardized again like it was when everything was 30-06 rifles and 45 pistols and SMGs or even the past 60 years with 556 has ruled most battle rifles.

6.5 Creedmoor is winning some contracts as well now.

Complicating logistics is never a good thing.

 

[Simeod]

This won't catch on but it'll hold a small market share then after a few years it'll fade away leaving people unable to shoot their rifles. Not that dissimilar to the 277 Fury and 270WSM. It's likely only going to be made by 2 companies: Savage and Geissele which is $3800. It's been a few years since Federal released a new cartridge so they just wanted to be included in some long range hype.

Incase you missed it, the new sig weapons accepted by the Army are the .277 fury. The .277 Fury is 6.8mm. Belted magnum and all.

 

[Wind Gypsy]

Incase you missed it, the new sig weapons accepted by the Army are the .277 fury. The .277 Fury is 6.8mm. Belted magnum and all.

Huh? The fury is not belted and it’s not a “magnum”.

 

[SMMiller55]

The problem I see is this; the shooting community has been inundated with “new” cartridge designs since 1906. But there really wasn’t much “new” about them. Add a little case length here, sharpen the angle of the shoulder there. Nothing that actually qualified as a stand alone breakthrough in how we utilize cartridge efficiency.

After all the years of the next best thing we have become skeptical of everything. Riflemen talk about ammo manufactures like they are the government and shout “they are all out to get me”. While Uncle Sam likely is out to get you, Federal and Winchester and Browning are likely not.

With that said if something truly different did come along would we even know it or would we yell at it for not already being a 30-06? What about the legacy cartridges we all know and love today? Did the .270 get the red carpet rolled out for it by the people? What about the .243?

I think we should be cautious of being too cautious. You would likely be surprised if you could have a conversation with some gentlemen back in 1906 about that fangled new cartridge that Springfield is trying to pull the wool over our eyes with.

The day we as westerners tell our weapons and ammunition developers that we are satisfied with the technology of a cartridge developed before we landed on the moon, and we need not go any further in researching performance, is the day we lose the arms race to the comrades and the derelicts.

Food for thought

 

[ismith]

The problem I see is this; the shooting community has been inundated with “new” cartridge designs since 1906. But there really wasn’t much “new” about them. Add a little case length here, sharpen the angle of the shoulder there. Nothing that actually qualified as a stand alone breakthrough in how we utilize cartridge efficiency.

After all the years of the next best thing we have become skeptical of everything. Riflemen talk about ammo manufactures like they are the government and shout “they are all out to get me”. While Uncle Sam likely is out to get you, Federal and Winchester and Browning are likely not.

With that said if something truly different did come along would we even know it or would we yell at it for not already being a 30-06? What about the legacy cartridges we all know and love today? Did the .270 get the red carpet rolled out for it by the people? What about the .243?

I think we should be cautious of being too cautious. You would likely be surprised if you could have a conversation with some gentlemen back in 1906 about that fangled new cartridge that Springfield is trying to pull the wool over our eyes with.

The day we as westerners tell our weapons and ammunition developers that we are satisfied with the technology of a cartridge developed before we landed on the moon, and we need not go any further in researching performance, is the day we lose the arms race to the comrades and the derelicts.

Food for thought

Cool story bro!