Sitka Gear Turkey Tool Belt

Northern Montana Grizzly DNA Study Results

BigHornRam

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 15, 2004
Messages
14,151
Location
"Land of Giant Rams"
Northwest grizzly count tops 545
Posted on Dec. 26
By the Associated Press



GREAT FALLS - More than 500 "unique individual grizzlies" roam the northwestern Montana backcountry from the Canadian border to Lincoln, with Glacier National Park boasting the largest number, according to DNA studies conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey.

In 2004, the bears left behind identifying hairs at tree rubs and on barbed wire, which were collected by researchers. The strands were DNA calling cards for geneticists, who recently determined that 545 different grizzlies visited the collection sites.

The work is part of what is believed to be the largest DNA-based wildlife population survey conducted in the world.


Not every bear in the ecosystem visited the hair-collection locations, so the 545 figure is a minimum count, not a total population estimate. Researchers in 2007 will continue to work on establishing a total population projection, factoring in the uncounted bears. A figure could be publicly available in late 2007 or in 2008.

Nonetheless, the minimum count of 545 is the first solid number bear managers have had for the Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem, one of the lower 48's few remaining grizzly strongholds. The hard data will be used in the management and recovery of the threatened population, they say.

"That probably was a lot more bears than anybody thought were out there," Chris Servheen, the nation's grizzly bear recovery coordinator, told the Great Falls Tribune.

Over 12 weeks in 2004, 34,000 hair samples were collected across 7.8 million acres stretching from the Canadian border to state Highway 200 on the Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem's southern border and from U.S. Highway 89 on the eastern edge to U.S. Highway 93 in the west.

The hairs were caught on barbed wire at 2,500 "hair corrals" put up as part of the study. Bears investigated because of scent placed at the corrals.

More than 5,000 natural bear rub trees, where bears leave their scent to let other bears know they're around, were checked as well.

The DNA project is led by the Geological Survey and supported by other federal, state and tribal agencies. Recent advances in genetic technology are being used to estimate population size.

The DNA fingerprints left on the barbed wire and trees allowed researchers to pinpoint not only the 545 individual bears, but gender and species (black bear or grizzly) as well.

Information on distribution and the range of bears also was gleaned.

Prior to the study, "We haven't had any way to measure the effectiveness of all of the recovery measures that have been taken," said U.S.G.S researcher Kate Kendall.

Glacier National Park makes up just an eighth of the Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem but it had almost 50 percent of the unique bears, the study found.

Kendall attributed the higher number to Glacier's climate, habitat and its protective national park designation.
 
"That probably was a lot more bears than anybody thought were out there," Chris Servheen, the nation's grizzly bear recovery coordinator, told the Great Falls Tribune.

And that's a DNA backed up hard count, wonder how many didn't get counted?

Future looks good for a limited Monana Grizzly hunt, don't you think Jose?
 
BHR, great point. I wouldnt hold my breath on a hunt in the near future.

I laugh when I read this because a couple of years ago, Kevin and I watched a sow with two cubs up in the Colville area. We took pics ( which you may have seen here) and we sent them into WDFG and they said no way was it a grizz, this isnt there range and that there werent any in Wa. HAHAHA about the funniest thing I had heard in some time. Maybe that sow came from the unknown population of Mt.
Oh, I forgot. They dont travel that far either.
 
Cameron,

It's going to be hard for the Gloom and Doomers to poo-poo DNA evidence. There's a biologist in the Butte area doing a similar bear hair study right now. It's supposed to be focusing on Black Bear, but it will be interesting to see how many different Grizzly samples she comes up with as well. I think a hunt in the next 5 years is not unrealistic. And hard counts are a must for that to happen. Also the hair sample testing could be usefull in wolf management as well. Then we could be less dependent on radio collars for counting wolves. The collar system is expensive, can cause health issues to the animals, and doesn't always work.

Overall, it's a neat science being used in wildlife management in a very usefull way. Another good reason to include this article in S. I., right Jose?
 
BigHornRam said:
Overall, it's a neat science being used in wildlife management in a very usefull way. Another good reason to include this article in S. I., right Jose?
BHR,
You now advocate science be used in managing wildlife? Why the change of heart?
 
Really Buzz. Key word is "good". You would have to agree that DNA sampling and documenting of grizzly populations is good science don't you?
 
This looks like it will give the biggest bang for the buck, it may not get them all, but should give a better over view of whats out there and what each animal is doing over the long haul if this technology is utilized for any great leangths of time. Good find Paul :)
 
ELKCHSR said:
This looks like it will give the biggest bang for the buck, it may not get them all, but should give a better over view of whats out there and what each animal is doing over the long haul if this technology is utilized for any great leangths of time. Good find Paul :)
Translator, please.
 
BigHornRam said:
Really Buzz. Key word is "good". You would have to agree that DNA sampling and documenting of grizzly populations is good science don't you?

BHR,
What does your "good" science tell you should be done on the 4 dams on the Lower Snake River?
 
Good science would say don't do the job half way Jose.

I'm surprised at the lack of excitement here from the gloom and doom, science nerd regulars? Look at all the potential uses for wildlife management this technology can provide. Data such as overall populations, bloodlines, population densities, dispersal patterns, quality of and desired habitat, ect, not to mention a deterance and conviction tool in poaching cases. I'm sure there are a number of other benefits that I have failed to mention.

And all this at a lower cost, greater accuracy, and less danger to the health of the animals. All this from the sample of one hair! Neat stuff.....how come none of you science guy's seemed to be too impressed with this technology?
 
It says they went to sites with scent, what kind of filter is that? That's amazing that they measure enough DNA to identify individuals like that. It can't be cheap, is it?
 
"In 2004, the bears left behind identifying hairs at tree rubs and on barbed wire, which were collected by researchers. The strands were DNA calling cards for geneticists, who recently determined that 545 different grizzlies visited the collection sites."

Tom,

You must have missed reading this part of the article. This science is fairly common now days and fairly inexpensive to do as well. Like a lot other technology, it keeps getting cheaper, more available, and better with each passing year
 
Oh, I get it. Thanks BHR....I had no idea what Tom was talking about.
 
A similar study was done here in SW Alberta which pointed to a very small number of Grizzlies which helped put us into a 4 year ban on hunting Grizzlies.
With the amount of grizzlies we ran accross this year made me question one of the biologists that was involved in the count. The reply I got off the record was that they were suprized at the numbers and it was way higher than what was portayed in their reports. The spring Grizzly draw will be back on maybe even a year early.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
113,584
Messages
2,025,978
Members
36,238
Latest member
3Wapiti
Back
Top