Gerald Martin
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2009
- Messages
- 8,731
He's probably smart enough to know that Greenhorn has been pounding the vote hoping for a Hopzone at the end of the deal.
No non-resident hunting on Wyoming wilderness unless you have a Guide - when are you all going to fight this?
- Thread starter Freddy Faulk
- Start date
bobbydean
Well-known member
I have never hunted with a guide. I am 66 and nonresident and if I could draw( which I cannot), I would still be hiring a guide.
I do not like the law, but a guide has its place for the old farts!
I do not like the law, but a guide has its place for the old farts!
warmer
Well-known member
If you apply before August 1, you have all the access to public land that you want.If you think not allowing NR's in USFS wilderness what do you think about not allowing NR hunters access to any public land like South Dakota is doing during archery season?
GF&P to host open house in Edgemont
The South Dakota Game, Fish and Parks (GFP) Department will be holding an open house at Edgemont's Victory Steakhouse and Lounge on Aug.1 from 10 a.m. - 12 p.m.rapidcityjournal.com
The following lands qualify as public lands: Game Production Areas, Waterfowl Production Areas, School and Public Lands, Corps of Engineer Land, Bureau of Land Management, Forest Service (National Forests and Grasslands),
- Non-residents archery season starts October 1 for public land users. The September 1 start date will remain unchanged for resident archers and nonresidents hunting on private lands.
- In order to hunt public land nonresident archery hunters must apply by August 1 and any nonresident archery deer application received after August 1 will be for a license valid on private land only.
Refuges, State Parks, and private lands leased for public hunting including Walk-In Areas, CREP and CHAP areas.
Suddenly not allowing NR's to hunt wilderness is not such a big deal, but still BS IMO. This deal in South Dakota is HUGE. Banning NR hunters for all public land including walk in, state, federal, etc is a loss for hunters and once one does it we could see more. Colorado my just ban resident hunters from accessing public land to sell more NR elk tags LOL.
Straight Arrow
Well-known member
Perhaps comprehension improved as he read Fin's note of caution and decided to decelerate the "Freddy fast track".
tzone
Well-known member
Boats don’t float on hot air. They’re for water. The air is for AIR planes. You got those confused.
dirtclod Az.
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2018
- Messages
- 2,776
Big Fin 86'ed Him!! Wish he would shut down his post.
I just glanced real quick at some of these comments, and in my opinion if I were a resident of WY I would keep it as is. I know this wilderness ban to NR seems to be outfitter driven. It does create in someway a place where residents can also have “their” place to hunt.
My perspective comes from living in SD where our pheasant hunting is very much a commercialized industry. Our state is also a great waterfowl destination also, but in the waterfowl it is not mentioned much that is because our state government has chosen to limit the amount of NR waterfowl hunters which keeps our great waterfowling turning into the same thing our pheasant hunting has.
Just my 2 cents
My perspective comes from living in SD where our pheasant hunting is very much a commercialized industry. Our state is also a great waterfowl destination also, but in the waterfowl it is not mentioned much that is because our state government has chosen to limit the amount of NR waterfowl hunters which keeps our great waterfowling turning into the same thing our pheasant hunting has.
Just my 2 cents
TheJason
Well-known member
Big Fin 86'ed Him!! Wish he would shut down his post.
Who is going to buy my case of beer for our bet?
warmer
Well-known member
"Go Fund Me" page.
WyLionHunter
New member
"Wish he would shut down his post"... You know, it's said that on these internet forums, regardless of the topic, 10% of the users actually participate in the actual topic, the 90% constantly hammer their keyboards and lay down 1,000's of posts...yet do not participate. These types are the ones who run crying to the moderator, try to get threads deleted, members banned. The 10 percenters usually get disenchanted with it all and fade away...the 90% bunch then take over and pretty much run the jointBig Fin 86'ed Him!! Wish he would shut down his post.
What percentile group do you fit in with, dirtclod Az?
I think you, as a person I assume is fairly experienced, take for granted just how incompetent in the backcountry some people are.
Inexperienced flatlanders renting llamas and going into the Washaki for a week is a scary idea. I think the law is absolute total BS and they should be allowed to do it, but many would still opt for an outfitter.
The Hedgehog
Well-known member
He's right about one thing, those that cry regularly and bother the moderators to ban and delete are big pillow biting babies.
But Wyoming real deal backcountry DIY hardcore NR game changer .... WHY on earth are you so dickheadedly charged about filling up your state's wilderness with NR hunters? It's bizarre.
But Wyoming real deal backcountry DIY hardcore NR game changer .... WHY on earth are you so dickheadedly charged about filling up your state's wilderness with NR hunters? It's bizarre.
TheJason
Well-known member
How long did you want me to leave this poll open?
The Hedgehog
Well-known member
WyoCatRealDealDude: If wilderness law changed right now, what do you think odds of drawing Deer in H would do, like overnight?
you can still hunt there, just make friends with a resident.
you can still hunt there, just make friends with a resident.
Irrelevant
Well-known member
Well you need you run a little math to make sure it's statistically accurate given our HT population
TheJason
Well-known member
That’s outside of my pay grade. Any stats geeks?
D
Deleted member 28227
Guest
Just FYI, all the members you are insulting have been here for years, posted stories of there hunts, helped other members plan their hunts, and most of us have actually met and/or hunted with each other in real life.
I'm not sure why you would join a forum just to insult people and argue, unless your goal is simply to troll people... I guess it's a bar fight you don't have to worry about getting injured in.
I have found this to be a great online forum, if you feel that your are better hunter than our membership and that we are just keyboard warriors, that is certainly your prerogative, but don't expect to be allowed to be part of this community if you can't treat other members with respect.
D
Deleted member 28227
Guest
Been a while... but I think assuming total membership of 23,000, 151 respondents, 5.3% saying pilgrims, you are looking at a margin of error of like 4.5%
Although there is no way to make sure a representative sample of the membership responded... probably just the guys who hammer their keyboards but who never actually go in the woods.
Irrelevant
Well-known member
What was that thread a while back that I think Buzz started about trophy animals? All I remember are pages of giant deer from Buzz. And the same with giant bulls from Greenhorn. Maybe we need to resurrect that one?
BluegrassBilly
Active member
When the 8th Circuit decided Minnesota ex rel. Hatch v. Hoeven, 456 F.3d 826, the court glossed over North Dakota's constitutional amendment about hunting and fishing, which is admittedly vague. I'm not aware of a more recent challenge to a state's discriminatory restrictions and pricing on non-resident hunting, but it would be interesting how the courts would rule on a privileges and immunities challenge in a state that more explicitly created a state-constitutional right to hunt and fish for only its residents.
Similar threads
