Pucky Freak
Well-known member
The more I read up on this subject, the more I realize the household budget to national deficit comparison is apples to golf balls.
States have to balance their budgets because they don't control the currency. The federal government DOES control currency. The US is approx. $30 trillion in debt. We could "print" $30 trillion dollars tomorrow, pay all of our obligations, and we'd all be debt-free. Woo-hoo! But then our dollars would be devalued by 60% (or whatever...it would be a lot), because our annual GNP is only about $23 billion, and we'd piss off everyone.
Basically, the absolute value of the national debt is somewhat irrelevant. Much more important are our long-term economic trends, which are quite rosy, compared to basically every other nation on earth.
Personally, it bothers me that our federal government consistently spends more than it takes in. I'm all for reforming entitlements to reign in spending in the long-term, and have a balanced budget during years when large-scale emergencies (wars, pandemics, etc.) do not occur. However, entitlement reform usually turns out to be political suicide, so we just kick the can down the road for another election cycle.
As it stands today, the percentage of the federal budget dedicated to servicing our $30 trillion in debt is a mere 5%. If it was 10% (to hold $60 trillion in debt), I would still hardly bat an eyelash.
States have to balance their budgets because they don't control the currency. The federal government DOES control currency. The US is approx. $30 trillion in debt. We could "print" $30 trillion dollars tomorrow, pay all of our obligations, and we'd all be debt-free. Woo-hoo! But then our dollars would be devalued by 60% (or whatever...it would be a lot), because our annual GNP is only about $23 billion, and we'd piss off everyone.
Basically, the absolute value of the national debt is somewhat irrelevant. Much more important are our long-term economic trends, which are quite rosy, compared to basically every other nation on earth.
Personally, it bothers me that our federal government consistently spends more than it takes in. I'm all for reforming entitlements to reign in spending in the long-term, and have a balanced budget during years when large-scale emergencies (wars, pandemics, etc.) do not occur. However, entitlement reform usually turns out to be political suicide, so we just kick the can down the road for another election cycle.
As it stands today, the percentage of the federal budget dedicated to servicing our $30 trillion in debt is a mere 5%. If it was 10% (to hold $60 trillion in debt), I would still hardly bat an eyelash.