Gastro Gnome - Eat Better Wherever

MT Mule Deer Age data accuracy and reality

I do think there is a scuz head element. Bucks that are so ugly you tend to look away. They grow to ripe old ages, with the nature of how hunters are selective during the rut. It can’t be healthy for our deer herd over an extended period of time.
 
1) 5, 4 mule deer bucks and 1 whitetail doe.
2/3)1 aged by FWP. It was at the CWD check station outside of Libby, a whitetail doe. They took the time to look at the teeth and aged it at 4.5. Based off the size and appearance of the doe of the doe and condition of the teeth I would have personally thought it was 2.5.
4) N/A
 
That buck was 3.5 years old genetics are a hell of a thing. Im glad you brought up age and not trophy size.
If that buck is looking like that at 3.5, you’d probably be really impressed with what he’d likely look like in 2-3 more years. Even though they can be really great when young they transform into a wicked cool beast when old.
 
I do think there is a scuz head element. Bucks that are so ugly you tend to look away. They grow to ripe old ages, with the nature of how hunters are selective during the rut. It can’t be healthy for our deer herd over an extended period of time.
This is exactly right. There used to be more of these around too but at least on public land these make up the few older age buck demographic that is reflected in any data. I only responded regarding fwp aging. I have aged my own critters and those of my buddies for over a decade. I have sent in many old scuz heads and these have tended to be the oldest bucks from Montana.

Edit: where as the highest scoring bucks in Montana have tended to be ones with fantastic genetics that made it to the ripe old age of 3.5-4.5. This is starkly different to the bucks we have taken from Colorado. They have typically been older
 
Last edited:
Use Promo Code Randy for 20% off OutdoorClass

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
113,701
Messages
2,030,329
Members
36,290
Latest member
whitetail69
Back
Top