shoots-straight
Well-known member
You can thank the sponsor of this bill for that. What did you expect would come from a bill like this? It pits sportsman against the landowners right or wrong.Again, not saying I'm supporting the bill, I just don't like the broad paint brushing of all landowners as anti-sportsmen.
Most landowners are good people. In fact most landowners I know are very tolerant of trespassing. Most, understand the problems, and know that mistakes happen. MOST!
I was with a large landowner in the Big Hole Valley, we rode sleds into his house one winter to check on the ranch.
Half the town of Wisdom, was there on his private pond fishing. (he had planted Kamloops rainbows for $2 each) He asked how the fishing was? They said oh great caught like 50 yesterday, and that number again today. There was around 10 people fishing. The rancher asked who gave out the permission to be there, and the original guy fishing gave some BS name for permission. The rancher told the guy fishing that it was BS cause that guy didn't own the pond or the ranch. The guy fishing asked how did he know? The rancher told him it's because he owned it.
Anyway he never made anybody pay for the fish, just told them to leave. I think he restocked the pond that following year. I don't think I would have been as tolerant.
A first offense of $135 is not BS. It was a min of $25. How about thinking about kids that accidentally trespass. I think that x-box and staying at home is a better risk for them. They will too.
You want to teach them right from wrong, but not deter them from hunting and fishing. We already are fighting a loosing battle with our youth as it is now.
Last edited: