jryoung
Well-known member
With the recent fatal mountain lion attack here in CA has many of the California hunting pages on FB filled with comments regarding them “losing their fear of man” because there is no hunting of them.
When I think about this statistically, it doesn’t make sense, and to me it’s just our anthropocentric interpretation of wildlife behavior.
In California Governor Reagan signed a mountain lion hunting moratorium in 1971, which was extended until 1991 when prop 117 was passed. So we have 53 years of no hunting, a population increase of 19 million people (20.3m -> 39.8M), continued loss of habitat yet no marked increase in attacks. Further, at first glance, states with regulated hunting have in general the same number of attacks that we have over the past 3 decades. Surely, if I dug into those numbers they’d be at a much higher rate per capita compared to California.
Certainly all animals have a natural fear of threats, elk and deer adapt to pressure which at its core is just an increase in human activity in their habitat. Conversely, they’ll also adapt and live closer to humans on the WUI type edges. I can understand animals adapting, but if mountain lions have “lost their fear of man” due to no hunting, shouldn’t there be an increase in attacks?
When I think about this statistically, it doesn’t make sense, and to me it’s just our anthropocentric interpretation of wildlife behavior.
In California Governor Reagan signed a mountain lion hunting moratorium in 1971, which was extended until 1991 when prop 117 was passed. So we have 53 years of no hunting, a population increase of 19 million people (20.3m -> 39.8M), continued loss of habitat yet no marked increase in attacks. Further, at first glance, states with regulated hunting have in general the same number of attacks that we have over the past 3 decades. Surely, if I dug into those numbers they’d be at a much higher rate per capita compared to California.
Certainly all animals have a natural fear of threats, elk and deer adapt to pressure which at its core is just an increase in human activity in their habitat. Conversely, they’ll also adapt and live closer to humans on the WUI type edges. I can understand animals adapting, but if mountain lions have “lost their fear of man” due to no hunting, shouldn’t there be an increase in attacks?