BuzzH
Well-known member
I know it was shot with rifle, but I believe PY has velvet catagory.Nope, need to take it off and then have it officially scored. That's how I knew and figured that score wasn't a legit number nor offical
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know it was shot with rifle, but I believe PY has velvet catagory.Nope, need to take it off and then have it officially scored. That's how I knew and figured that score wasn't a legit number nor offical
They do, he was wearing orange. Jumped to conclusions therefore that it was shot with a gun. Also, thread is about b&c and pope and young has a lower entry standardI know it was shot with rifle, but I believe PY has velvet catagory.
But scored identical. A py 180 net mule deer isn't smaller because it was shot with a bow.They do, he was wearing orange. Jumped to conclusions therefore that it was shot with a gun. Also, thread is about b&c and pope and young has a lower entry standard
Yes but a P&Y velvet buck that scores 180 is not the same as a B&C 180 buckBut scored identical. A py 180 net mule deer isn't smaller because it was shot with a bow.
The reality is that it isn’t the 70’s and private land isn’t without it’s problems with access.Bring better in it was in the 60’s and 70’s might be true for guys hunting private but it certainly not true for the public land hunter. While there might be more game now then back then there is an absolute shit ton more hunters.
I would take less game and less hunters over what we have now.
We killed plenty of elk in the 70’s mainly because there were so few hunters.
Correct, ask anyone that paid even slight attention to deer populations, all say the same thing.This is 100 percent correct in the areas that I am familiar with.
Montana FWP maybe?I don't know anyone that claims more mule deer now in Montana.
I don't think even they do.Montana FWP maybe?
They do over here when I went to the meet and greet with the director in Miles City mule deer where brought up. The wildlife manager said “we are knocking it out of the park with our mule deer management” why would would we change anything when our numbers are so good. Record counts in Prairie county. Glory days.I don't think even they do.
Record numbers that's hilarious.They do over here when I went to the meet and greet with the director in Miles City mule deer where brought up. The wildlife manager said “we are knocking it out of the park with our mule deer management” why would would we change anything when our numbers are so good. Record counts in Prairie county. Glory days.
Managing for trophies is one thing but how about we start with admitting that we are the only state that has general season unregulated rifle season encompassing the entire mule deer rut and it has an extremely negative impact on age class. But no…wildlife manager in miles city “better than the Henry mountains”. WtfThe reality is that it isn’t the 70’s and private land isn’t without it’s problems with access.
How you manage the game populations now, under the current conditions is a tough thing to accomplish and keep hunters, landowners, outfitters and FWP in tune to a very diverse user base.
Managing for trophies isn’t the only item on the agenda, and there are still those that don’t need a trophy to consider hunting successful. Public land isn’t barren and game is still there. Hunting pressure is greater now as well, but hunting sites, such as this one, complicates things even more do to the awareness that it puts on the state and it’s resources.
Hunting does have to be done within the boundaries that exist today and not what they were when I was a kid or when elk were easier to get in the 70’s. I, for one, still enjoy Montana and all it has to offer…
But no…wildlife manager in miles city “better than the Henry mountains”. Wtf
It was saidWas this really said? Ours told me that there’s no proof that rifle hunting in the rut has an effect on age class.
He was talking counts but still…cmon manWas this really said? Ours told me that there’s no proof that rifle hunting in the rut has an effect on age class.
Tell him to go kill a mature buck in October. It’s a hard hunt. Anyone that hunts mule deer should know that. Why are later season colorado tags in such demand? Just lower hunting pressure? Or is it the chances of seeing a big old muley increase exponentially? Probably both but still you have to be purposely ignoring the blatantly obvious to make that statementWas this really said? Ours told me that there’s no proof that rifle hunting in the rut has an effect on age class.
For hunter opportunity and the ability to hunt every year it’s way better than the Henry’s, for killing a large buck, yeah noBut no…wildlife manager in miles city “better than the Henry mountains”. Wtf
Sounds more like talking out of his ass...He was talking counts but still…cmon man
AssholesThey do over here when I went to the meet and greet with the director in Miles City mule deer where brought up. The wildlife manager said “we are knocking it out of the park with our mule deer management” why would would we change anything when our numbers are so good. Record counts in Prairie county. Glory days.