Caribou Gear

Montana General Season Structure Proposal

With antelope the biologists count animals on private land and base the quotas on the total population. This policy has destroyed public land hunting in several areas. The area north of Ryegate has very few antelope on hunt able land and hundreds of hunters chasing them. Try getting a young kid interested in hunting under those conditions.
 
With antelope the biologists count animals on private land and base the quotas on the total population. This policy has destroyed public land hunting in several areas. The area north of Ryegate has very few antelope on hunt able land and hundreds of hunters chasing them. Try getting a young kid interested in hunting under those conditions.
Antelope season in general is a gong show with people. Every unit I’ve hunted has been hard to get away from people. I have killed some nice bucks in that unit on public
 
Last season I hunted 7 days without seeing a single antelope on hunt able land. Not many hunters after opening day as they pretty knew it was a lost cause
 
With antelope the biologists count animals on private land and base the quotas on the total population. This policy has destroyed public land hunting in several areas. The area north of Ryegate has very few antelope on hunt able land and hundreds of hunters chasing them. Try getting a young kid interested in hunting under those conditions.
FWP does this with just about everything.
 
Heres some data on prongorn/elk permits from the earlier part of the conversation. Area 630 - for example, 25 cow elk tags, 50 bull tags, and 200 antelope tags. Lets go R7 - 7500 antelope tags, 480 rifle elk tags, 2100 cow tags. Seems like its basically true across the units. 3 times as many lope hunters as total elk hunters.

Yes. People dump their antelope and drive home. Is someone from Helena or kalispell who drew an antelope permit by miles city, and plans to hunt mule deer there in october going to do the same thing? 🤷‍♂️

Screenshot_20250401_070648_OneDrive.jpgScreenshot_20250401_070623_OneDrive.jpgScreenshot_20250401_070549_OneDrive.jpg
 
Last season I hunted 7 days without seeing a single antelope on hunt able land. Not many hunters after opening day as they pretty knew it was a lost cause
It’s kinda like anything else I’ve spent enough time up there I have a couple spots that produce for me. One gets better later it I the season from the pressure
 
Heres some data on prongorn/elk permits from the earlier part of the conversation. Area 630 - for example, 25 cow elk tags, 50 bull tags, and 200 antelope tags. Lets go R7 - 7500 antelope tags, 480 rifle elk tags, 2100 cow tags. Seems like its basically true across the units. 3 times as many lope hunters as total elk hunters.

Yes. People dump their antelope and drive home. Is someone from Helena or kalispell who drew an antelope permit by miles city, and plans to hunt mule deer there in october going to do the same thing? 🤷‍♂️

View attachment 366363View attachment 366364View attachment 366365
You are leaving out all the people that are looking to fill there elk A tags on a cow or spike. We are even seeing some NR doing this instead of going west.
 
You are leaving out all the people that are looking to fill there elk A tags on a cow or spike. We are even seeing some NR doing this instead of going west.
Thats true - cant those folks do the same thing in october (on private land - including bma) with the proposal though?
 
Forky, do you have an actual complaint about the proposal? I think every season structure in the West has some form of give and take. You seem to want to find some random “gotcha” about this, but I think that’s going to be the case across all proposals. The current one has issues, the proposal has issues, the people that just want to lower NR’s have issues. The antelope argument is a very very nit picky piece that may have a small effect. I’d just be curious what your actual issue is with the proposal.
 
Forky, do you have an actual complaint about the proposal? I think every season structure in the West has some form of give and take. You seem to want to find some random “gotcha” about this, but I think that’s going to be the case across all proposals. The current one has issues, the proposal has issues, the people that just want to lower NR’s have issues. The antelope argument is a very very nit picky piece that may have a small effect. I’d just be curious what your actual issue is with the proposal.
Why are the arguments against incidental harvest being a concern with the proposal a nit picky "gotcha" when that is part of the basis of the proposal in the first place?

I dont want to find something thats a quick "gotcha" about it - but outside of HT - there are plenty of people skeptical and/or against the proposal and its benefits.

The arguments arent always great, some involve politics, but the valid arguments with merit should be discussed and brought up. Hopefully with good reason and logic applied to countering that argument sucessfully.
 
Why are the arguments against incidental harvest being a concern with the proposal a nit picky "gotcha" when that is part of the basis of the proposal in the first place?

I dont want to find something thats a quick "gotcha" about it - but outside of HT - there are plenty of people skeptical and/or against the proposal and its benefits.

The arguments arent always great, some involve politics, but the valid arguments with merit should be discussed and brought up. Hopefully with good reason and logic applied to countering that argument sucessfully.
I agree.

Back to my question. Do you have an issue with the proposal?
 
I agree.

Back to my question. Do you have an issue with the proposal?
I am for it - but i also see it as a mixed bag, but i understand it is a balance and nothing can solve it without some sacrifices here and there. My main focus, will probably always be archery elk. This proposal doesnt really do much to change that - except the slight shift in season and for the potential gains - im okay with it. I want to see more and healthier age class in mule deer on public especiwlly - and i think this will do that, especially in western MT. I also know it wont be awesome right away, but i think chasing mule deer in the mountains in early october will be awesome in its own right.

But - if i were primarily a general rifle elk hunter - im not sure id be in the same camp for support for it. Does that make sense?
 
Thats true - cant those folks do the same thing in october (on private land - including bma) with the proposal though?
Can't shoot the spike, but cows for sure and I hope that they do in large numbers to help move elk off of private land and if you are spending time after a private land elk, you are not adding more pressure to public land mule deer.
 
Can't shoot the spike, but cows for sure and I hope that they do in large numbers to help move elk off of private land and if you are spending time after a private land elk, you are not adding more pressure to public land mule deer.
How would that work for big blocks of bma that include public land, within the BMA? A few north of you came to mind. Additionally, the cmr and usfs excluded for that - even with a b tag most of the time for a lot of r7?

I suppose its all pretty specific - but some of the best areas for any of the species would be close to USFS, BLM, BMA, and private not enrolled in BMA. Not all that far from eachother.
 
Far too many tags. For both seasons. And I think most of the bigger bulls hit the dirt during archery. I've always thought elk hunting in the Breaks would be world class with the right management. mtmuley
Everyone wants big bulls in the Breaks....they also want to hunt big bulls every year in the Breaks. Can't have both.
 
How would that work for big blocks of bma that include public land, within the BMA? A few north of you came to mind. Additionally, the cmr and usfs excluded for that - even with a b tag most of the time for a lot of r7?

I suppose its all pretty specific - but some of the best areas for any of the species would be close to USFS, BLM, BMA, and private not enrolled in BMA. Not all that far from eachother.
Maybe I am farther south than you think. I can't think of any large BMA with lots of public near me. North of the Yellowstone, yes, but many of those units are OTC for elk.
 
Use Promo Code Randy for 20% off OutdoorClass

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
115,226
Messages
2,088,537
Members
36,989
Latest member
Rs783673
Back
Top