seeth07
Well-known member
Yes I know. To some. I get that. And if those that do want to harbor elk aren't claiming damages and accept having the herd of elk on their landscape, it's their right to as private land owners. Great for them and I guess I'm just really torn on the issue about how many elk they can kill. It's their prime habitat that draws the elk to it right? Or maybe it's less than prime but treated as a sanctuary. Either way it's improving the elk herd and putting more elk on the landscape right? Just because the elk isn't on public land doesn't mean that these few landowners can't be good for the improvement of elk herds.Did you even listen to the podcast? Randy covered that very well on how the financials don’t matter to some. It is not as simple as what you’re stating.
Just my unbiased view from a lame non resident who has never stepped foot in Montana hearing and reading these stories about the elk situation.
Let the hate mail rain my way