theat
Well-known member
Well, Daines got an earful from me. I hope the rest of you Montana guys let him know how you feel about his vote.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Idaho Senators Crapo and Risch also voted "No" on the permanent re-authorization of the LWCF amendment and "Yes" to the Daines amendment. Probably want to let them know about your disappointment too.
Senator Risch,
I want to let you know how extremely disappointed I am that you voted no on Amendment #92 to S.1 that would have permanently reauthorized the LWCF. As someone who purports to be looking out for the best interest of Sportsmen this was indeed a low blow. The law expires in September and before that happens I strongly encougage you to get it reauthorized.
Hunting and fishing require more than a rod and a gun. It also requires a place to go. Unfortunately your track record on public lands is getting worse by the day, and I and lots of other sportsmen in the state are taking notice.
Yours Truly,
Andrew Smart
"I know my colleagues in the Montana Wilderness Association and Backcountry Hunters and Anglers as well, feel like they’ve been sucker punched. They didn’t see this coming." Potts says conservationists feel sucker punched because in December, the Republican Senator sent groups like theirs a letter asking for their ideas on how Congress can increase energy development in the state while ensuring good stewardship of the environment. And then, "Last week we were quite disappointed to learn that Senator Daines had cast several votes that he had not discussed with his constituents," Potts says. "One of which would have re-authorized the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF). "