SAJ-99
Well-known member
We have moved into the "personal insult" stage.The question isn't how it will turn out. The question is who will take the blame. The Fed is the obvious and easy target here.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We have moved into the "personal insult" stage.The question isn't how it will turn out. The question is who will take the blame. The Fed is the obvious and easy target here.
You can’t make this up:We have moved into the "personal insult" stage.
From this book, I realize it probably lists tariffs as a negotiating tool.This has nothing to do with Kamela or TDS. Basic economics. Go read this book and explain when tariffs have ever worked or cutting rates in an inflationary period was the best decision.
View attachment 369245
I don't mind if tariffs are used to negotiate deals, but there seems to be no rush to negotiate, so of course it wasn't enough. Japan hit the same wall last week. Trump is negotiating like a NY RE broker...Get close to the deal and ask for more. Japan guy basically said "I have no idea what they want". On a daily basis it becomes clean there is no plan, just a clown show of people lacking the necessary experience to even get the basics of the job done.No one expected the EU to respond to the US's retaliatory tariffs with an offer of 0% if we go to 0%. The natural response is, "Yes! Take it!"
However, Trump/Bessent say it's not enough- we need you (EU) to increase US energy imports by 33%.
I'm not following. There are no moratoriums against offshore drilling. What there is oil companies staring at a depressed oil price and a curve in backwardation.Given the state of the SPR, this is risky. Given the state of moratoriums against offshore drilling, this is risky. The US doesn't have much oil to do this, but we could with a policy change.
Krishna Guha, vice chairman at Evercore ISI, said in a Friday note that “recent market action shows a loss of confidence in Trump economic policy,” citing higher Treasury yields and a weaker dollar.
Analysts at Macquarie said in a Monday note that “flight from the USD” stems from “concerns over the Fed’s independence” and a lack of trade deal announcements, signaling that negotiations over tariffs might last many months.
The yield on the 10-year Treasury rose to 4.365% on Monday, up from Thursday. US trading was closed Friday in observance of Good Friday.
I believe in free markets and free trade.From this book, I realize it probably lists tariffs as a negotiating tool.
Does the book describe a time when tariffs were used to make other countries lower or even cancel their tariffs?
The point of my question is twofold:
1) I will read the book if it is helpful and2) Trump seems to be using tariffs in ways that even many republicans decried or at least react with agnosticism or ignorance as to the intended effect.
No one expected the EU to respond to the US's retaliatory tariffs with an offer of 0% if you go to 0%. The natural response is, "Yes! Take it!"
However, Trump/Bessent say it's not enough- we need you (EU) to increase US energy imports by 33%.
Given the state of the SPR, this is risky. Given the state of moratoriums against offshore drilling, this is risky. The US doesn't have much oil to do this, but we could with a policy change.
We don't have much of a hook to broker peace between Ukraine and Russia. Could the US's edge improve if we threatened Russia's imports to the EU and other countries?
In regard to your 'no rush to negotiate' observation. I don't know how much time it takes to resolve a tariff deal, but Trump issued a pause on tariffs for 90 days so they could negotiate with 70+ countries. To me, that seems like a 'flash-in-the-pan' amount of time to negotiate resolutions with 70 people, much less Countries.I don't mind if tariffs are used to negotiate deals, but there seems to be no rush to negotiate, so of course it wasn't enough. Japan hit the same wall last week. Trump is negotiating like a NY RE broker...Get close to the deal and ask for more. Japan guy basically said "I have no idea what they want". On a daily basis it becomes clean there is no plan, just a clown show of people lacking the necessary experience to even get the basics of the job done.
If I was a conspiracy guy, I would almost say the entire thing is a set up to make money by investing in specific beaten down assets right before a convenient Truth Social post.
I'm not following. There are no moratoriums against offshore drilling. What there is oil companies staring at a depressed oil price and a curve in backwardation.
Jun $62.3
Sept $60.4
Dec $59.6
in the upper $50's until March 2027.
Most recent estimate I heard was cash-flow breakeven oil price for US companies was around $55. No one is starting an offshore project at these prices. Don't believe me? Watch these leases (ironically, put in the IRA by Biden).
![]()
National OCS Oil and Gas Leasing Program
As required by Section 18 of the OCS Lands Act, the National Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Oil and Gas Leasing Program (National OCS Program) consists of a schedule of lease sales indicating the size, timing, and location of proposed leasing activities on the OCS that the Secretary of the...www.boem.gov
I will restate. SPR isn't filled because money has to be allocated in the Congressional budget to do so. I have posited that there is no rush because oil in west Texas is just as safe as oil in a salt cavern in LA. But either way, it isn't policy, it is the budget. It seems everything is about the budget.
Thread cleaned up. In an effort to keep open for you.
Y’all are walking the line of a small vacation.
LL - leave them alone.
Everyone else - you fed him to keep going.
I believe in free markets and free trade.
Why should the U.S. force EU to buy our gas? The U.S. can’t be competitive in the global gas market enough to entice the EU want to buy U.S. gas?
OK, in some places maybe (Coast of FL or CA). Of course he can undo most of that if it was done at Federal level. It can seem like it is caught in a "pending court decision", but really it is caught in an economic price depression with extreme uncertainty. I can't even begin to guess what the mental conflict he has on drilling in the Gulf. I tend to think it is pretty flexible.Moratoriums are in place and historically are a blue-side campaigning point. Trump tried to nix them during his first term, Biden added them, then Trump nixed them with pending court decisions disputing his executive authority/ability to do so. Trump is personally divided since he still wants to protect his home state from offshore drilling.
I think the $55 was the Permian, (It was a former CEO - Don't ever listen to a current CEO talking in a public way - and by cash-flow BE, that means to maintain dividend and keep stock from tanking). Permian is probably the easiest (price per product) place to drill in the US. Everything else is more expensive, regardless of what any AI search says. Transocean and Noble are examples of how management for offshore contracting can result in different outcomes, but both trade with the price of oil. The increasing cost is a confluence of factors. The tariffs on steel and aluminum make building a new rig more expensive and the cost of debt is double what it was 4 years ago. Not to say someone won't lend them money, but it won't be cheap. The same can be said of just about any industry and building a new plant. This is even before trying to find workers.You have a point that the $55 price is a deterrent, but shale oil and fracking have historically been more expensive than offshore drilling. This could revert again as it has done in the past.
SPR isn't filled because money has to be allocated in the Congressional budget to do so.