Thermal use is already regulated appropriately and clearly defined as to when and how they can be used. What about thermals in Idaho would you like to see addressed?I would like to see them take a run at thermals before turrets and rangefinders
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thermal use is already regulated appropriately and clearly defined as to when and how they can be used. What about thermals in Idaho would you like to see addressed?I would like to see them take a run at thermals before turrets and rangefinders
16lbsI always thought it was interesting there was some kind of 12lb rule for rifles but people can still essentially lock their rifle in a heavy tripod and shoot.
I mean - its certainly possible with open sights too.
Ever hear of
Thanks. I’ve never broken 10 so it’s not something I’ve payed close attention to.16lbs
Yeah. or the fixed 4x scopes on a bunch of ww2 snipers.I mean - its certainly possible with open sights too.
Ever hear of shiloh sharps or quigley shoots?
Thermal use is already regulated appropriately and clearly defined as to when and how they can be used. What about thermals in Idaho would you like to see addressed?
Is it?Thermal use is already regulated appropriately and clearly defined as to when and how they can be used. What about thermals in Idaho would you like to see addressed?
I have used a handheld thermal to hunt in England. It’s where is my concern. Game changing. It made my $2k binoculars useless.Ah, I understand what you’re saying now. I wasn’t thinking about scanning as much as thermal scopes. But since it’s illegal to use drones to locate game animals that takes care of the thermal scanning issue. I suppose you could scan using a hand held device from the ground.
You’re probably right, might need some more clarification and rules to dictate their use.
Hmmm. That’s interesting.I have used a handheld thermal to hunt in England. It’s where is my concern. Game changing. It made my $2k binoculars useless.
Hmmm. That’s interesting.
It would be pretty handy here in the panhandle. Can’t see 30 yards. At least you’d know where they were…still have to get to them though. Haha
I never thought about the thermal applications. Guess I’m old school now
Meh, you'd be better off banning "Long Range Hunting" .Range finder idea is stupid. Turret idea means well but also pointless with mil/moa reticle. Limiting scope magnification would be better. If they want to reduce wound/loss then ban archery equipment
You’re right. I just never thought about that.There's a huge part of your state where they could have a big impact and would even be useful in the panhandle. A handheld scanner can make it waaaaaay easier to find game.
So you put a piece of black tape around it until the time of the shot.Yeah because it’s impossible to see a dial turret with index marks and numbers exposed on top of the scope. It’s easier than checking someone’s license and way easier than checking legal muzzleloader bullets.
I have exactly. I've written about my former (renter) neighbor who wounded a buck with his POS Rem 760 off his porch. When I asked him what his rifle was zeroed at, he replied "...about a hundred when I did it back in Wisconsin." The house is on the west end of two forty acres squares. He was shooting at a buck in the other 40, so not less than 400.I’ve never seen the first case savage guy here but I’ve seen plenty of local dorks with magnums and turrets that have admittedly walked it in on critters way too far away to be scared and watched another guy dump a full box of shells cross canyon at a mule deer that was far enough away his rangefinder wouldn’t read
And 338 you would testify in court as to what those index marks indicate and also testify as to their accuracy ?? How many hunting licenses have you checked over the years ??Yeah because it’s impossible to see a dial turret with index marks and numbers exposed on top of the scope. It’s easier than checking someone’s license and way easier than checking legal muzzleloader bullets.
If it’s seized as evidence…would you even need to?And 338 you would testify in court as to what those index marks indicate and also testify as to their accuracy ?? How many hunting licenses have you checked over the years ??
To seize that firearm without a warrant, there has to be probable cause that a crime has been committed and a citation issued.If it’s seized as evidence…would you even need to?