Idaho Lion Proposals

Agreed, the lion hunters in Montana really jacked things up.
All the lion guys want to do here, with the exception of a few is chase them around. If I see a lion every year while hunting there are too many or I am just lucky. The LE deer unit where I do most of my hunting has dwindled in tag quotas. And it ain't because of habitat or development encroachment or anything else. Sorry to go off topic to Montana. mtmuley
 
All the lion guys want to do here, with the exception of a few is chase them around. If I see a lion every year while hunting there are too many or I am just lucky. The LE deer unit where I do most of my hunting has dwindled in tag quotas. And it ain't because of habitat or development encroachment or anything else. Sorry to go off topic to Montana. mtmuley
And the overharvest and poaching have nothing to do with the dwindling deer population?
 
As far as the SE Idaho specific proposals, it'll simply concentrate houndsmen from all over southern Idaho in November and April to kill any remaining lions. All three of those units have good access, plenty of public land and their lion populations have been decimated.
I could see houndsmen showing up to run cats but I doubt you see an influx of houndsmen showing up to kill cats unless they tree a giant. Outfitters on the other hand will probably book more clients and maybe kill a few more. How often do you have good snow in November and April?
 
It's an LE unit. Any overharvest would be because of poaching. mtmuley
Who's to say that there is to many permits issued? How much does the huge elk population affect the deer? also, I'm getting very skeptical about all the deer and elk "deadheads" being "found" anymore in the LE units.
 
Who's to say that there is to many permits issued? How much does the huge elk population affect the deer? also, I'm getting very skeptical about all the deer and elk "deadheads" being "found" anymore in the LE units.
The unit went from an initial 35 permits I believe down to 10 last season. I can assure you a huge elk population is not an issue in this unit. I am not the only hunter familiar with the unit that believes cats are a big part of the problem. I'll quit hijacking the thread now. mtmuley
 
I rarely sit through it but the cat hunters get pretty riled up at the FWP meetings. mtmuley
The fly fisherman of the fishing world. The bowhunters of the big-game hunting world.

You need a mop for the tears at the end of every meeting from all of those groups, and a set of earplugs if you want to comment on something later on in the agenda.
 
The fly fisherman of the fishing world. The bowhunters of the big-game hunting world.

You need a mop for the tears at the end of every meeting from all of those groups, and a set of earplugs if you want to comment on something later on in the agenda.
I know a few guys that are cat killing machines. One outfitter I know is really hard on them here. But, I get what you mean. Really hard to listen to the lion segment. mtmuley
 
I know a few guys that are cat killing machines. One outfitter I know is really hard on them here. But, I get what you mean. Really hard to listen to the lion segment. mtmuley
You think the outfitter is mainly motivated by making money?
 
I could see houndsmen showing up to run cats but I doubt you see an influx of houndsmen showing up to kill cats unless they tree a giant. Outfitters on the other hand will probably book more clients and maybe kill a few more. How often do you have good snow in November and April?
It'll add pressure from outsiders for sure. We get decent snows here during those times most years. All the IF, Rigby, Rexburg guys will be down here, plus add the Twin guys and a lot in between. I don't blame them for coming. If I could hunt up there on a Nov or April snow I would.

When houndsmen travel to another territory they typically don't hunt, they often quit caring what gets killed. It is a crappy human nature thing, but true. I'd love to say I think they will only shoot big toms, but even many of the local the guys who hunt those units aren't very selective.

That November season will get really crowded Thanksgiving week if any snow falls.

It'll be a significant change with more pressure, but we are really already seeing the damage in those units this year. The first two years after no quotas we saw a decline, but the number of tracks plummeted this year in those areas.
 
If you are a deer hunter and farmers complained and the law was changed so that you could just shoot deer 365 days per year, would you not feel screwed? You get a year or two of being able to hunt anytime, then the population is gone.

We have seen our lion population plummet recently due to quotas being removed. Now they want to remove all seasons, further decimating them. Houndsmen can't turn their dogs loose on tracks that aren't there. We take our sport seriously and it's more of a lifestyle raising hounds and hunting them. It is disheartening to see this.View attachment 359961
That’s a damn shame. Def should be treated as big game.
 
I doubt that the year round season will result in many more lions being killed. That sentence could be used in favor of or in opposition to the all year season proposal. On the one hand it won't make much difference. On the other, why do it if it won't make a difference?

The video gives some justification for increased lion harvest. Collar studies have shown elevated predation on mule deer fawns (12% due to lions, it was 20% in 2020) and even adult bucks (18% predation rate by lions).

We already hashed out the fact that lions are not responsible for the current low population of mule deer in a previous thread. However, the predation rates cited in the video are considered to be higher than have been observed in previous studies and are high enough to have an impact.

I think lions will be fine even with these changes. I'm in favor.
 
Ollin Magnetic Digiscoping Systems

Forum statistics

Threads
114,659
Messages
2,066,540
Members
36,698
Latest member
BAZINGA RACING
Back
Top