Irrelevant
Well-known member
I feel a little bad for you ID residents. We pulled up to a trailhead this fall, all nine of the rigs were out of state. But I've yet to meet a prick in the woods in ID. WA is full of them!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I feel a little bad for you ID residents. We pulled up to a trailhead this fall, all nine of the rigs were out of state. But I've yet to meet a prick in the woods in ID. WA is full of them!
I agree with you. But the mindset of if you don't want to pay then don't play will lead to a drop off of NR's, which is what all the residents who are complaining and blaming all the hunting problems on NR's want. I don't know but I would guess a very large chunk of the money that Idaho funds its fish and game programs come from NR fees.You have every right not to come to Idaho if you don’t like how the state runs NR hunting.
I didn’t like the hammer placed on the mentor program.
As my title states, actions by Idaho are against NRs due to residents complaining about hunter numbers.
I see a few NR vehicle plates here and there but I haven’t spoken to one NR on a hill. In fact, I’ve only spoken to one resident on a hill (good guy). It seems the problem now is the ATV races everywhere to road hunt.
Cause non resident’s know everything and should run our state as wellSoon the complainers will see that ID residents are the problem as the crowding continues.
No - b/c you have a shitload of new resident hunters everywhere with more coming from the communist state of Kalifornia, the People's Republic of Oregon and King Inslee's Washington StateCause non resident’s know everything and should run our state as well
Matt
No - b/c you have a shitload of new resident hunters everywhere with more coming from the communist state of Kalifornia, the People's Republic of Oregon and King Inslee's Washington State
Don’t forget Texas, Utah, and some other states with military bases, between Gowen Field and the air force base in Mtn.HomeNo - b/c you have a shitload of new resident hunters everywhere with more coming from the communist state of Kalifornia, the People's Republic of Oregon and King Inslee's Washington State
Doesn't mean good entertainment can't be derived from blaming non-residents for all that is wrong with hunting in whatever state. Hell, blaming non-residents is considered another form of sport in the west.
Carry on .......
Wasn't the cap on just controlled hunts? Where it's now on OTC tags as well? I thought that's where the big issue with NR's came from.Since 1990, Idaho has kept the same cap on NR deer/elk tags, if I recall correctly. In that same time, Idaho has added 780,000 new residents, of which I suspect a good percentage are now resident hunters. To say that crowding is the result of non-residents is not supported by the figures.
Doesn't mean good entertainment can't be derived from blaming non-residents for all that is wrong with hunting in whatever state. Hell, blaming non-residents is considered another form of sport in the west.
Carry on .......
I don't think so. I think the elk cap has been around 12,000. Can't remember what the deer cap has been, but I think it was slightly higher than the elk cap.Wasn't the cap on just controlled hunts? Where it's now on OTC tags as well? I thought that's where the big issue with NR's came from.
Yep, my bad on that one, I always understood that only the controlled hunts were capped, but the OTC's are capped as well. Thanks Fin, I guess that's the perk of being a resident, I usually don't have to dive so hard into those numbers!I don't think so. I think the elk cap has been around 12,000. Can't remember what the deer cap has been, but I think it was slightly higher than the elk cap.
There have been NR caps for as long as I remember. They didn't always sell out and in years they didn't sell out, residents were able to buy a second tag.
One possible solution would to make all hunters whether resident or non-res pick their hunt unit, season and weapon. They would then only be allowed to hunt their unit of choice. No more applying for their "favorite" GMU and then go hunt somewhere else when they don't draw it.My big concern is that my favorite WT unit has a high cap. I am afraid that means that those who didn't get their favorite GMU deer tag will come to mine.
I think it’ll eventually go to that way for residents for deer. Elk already has specific zone and weapon type limitations.One possible solution would to make all hunters whether resident or non-res pick their hunt unit, season and weapon. They would then only be allowed to hunt their unit of choice. No more applying for their "favorite" GMU and then go hunt somewhere else when they don't draw it.
That would greatly reduce overcrowding.
I think that is fair for residents to be able to have a long season in a general unit. Part of the perks of living there. Non residents for the most part (except for border huggers) are going to be a week to 10 days .I think it’ll eventually go to that way for residents for deer. Elk already has specific zone and weapon type limitations.
As a resident, I could theoretically hunt from August to November using archery and rifle general hunts. I personally hunted three different deer units during the rifle season.
I think that is fair for residents to be able to have a long season in a general unit. Part of the perks of living there.
But “why” is there an archery fee in the first place?Because, like other states that have also raised fees across the board, the Fish and Game is run like a business. They will get every dollar they can from any extra fees possible. It's has and is becoming even more of a pay to play activity. Only the wealthy will be allowed to participate.
Pa's non residet fees should be absed upon the buyer's state of resident.. Conn. Del and RI should be atleast 2,000 a year per person. if they live in Philly it should cost them 5K NJ should be aligned with PhillySeems a little high