Ollin Magnetic Digiscoping System

Idaho Group Wins Victory over Salt Lake BLM in order to IMPROVE Hunting

Nemont,

You're way too smart to believe that WWP will ever get that pipe-dream passed...maybe they're simply using some of Jose's methods to get a few of those hairy-legged tofu eaters to send them $35....

Buzz,

I don't believe that the Buffalo Commons will ever happen either. I just think that an organization that is led by people with those views are not representing my interests in public lands as a hunter. Jose can give money to whom ever he wishes and support their causes but I disagree with WWP. They already are attempting to apply public lands policy to private property.

Jose,

There are several pro hunting organizations pushing the BLM to obey the law.
These include the globally recognized, highly sensitive Teshekpuk Lake, the world's most important molting ground for the Pacific black brant and countless other geese, and the Utukok Uplands, calving ground to the Western Arctic caribou herd - by far the largest in Alaska.

Last year, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), due to vehement opposition by bipartisan groups - including local Eskimos (who depend on Teshekpuk as an important subsistence area), the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, an array of conservation groups and pro-hunting wildlife organizations such as Ducks Unlimited

In addition here is the list of organizations that WWP supports and works with. This is taken directly from their website. Notice any groups that work hard to end hunting? Or how about Earth First! that has been suspected of being a terrorist organization? Or Forest Guardians who want to charge hunters to access public lands. Or Andy Kerr's Larch Company that is working to ending the baiting of bears. In addition Andy Kerr supports taxing hikers, bird watchers, hunters and fisherman more to access public lands, even to include paying up to $500 for the privilege (not the right) to hunt on public land. These are the people who influence the decision makers at WWP. Go look at the WWP's board of directors, nearly all of them belong to more then one of the organizations listed below or also sit on their boards and advisory councils.


Alliance for the Wild Rockies

Amerian Lands Alliance

Center for Biological Diversity

Committee for the High Desert in Idaho

Defenders of Wildlife

Earth First!

Environmental News Network

Forest Guardians

Gallatin Wildlife Association

Great Old Broads for Wilderness

Greater Yellowstone Coalition

Idaho Conservation League

Jackson Hole Conservation Alliance

The Larch Company


Montana Wilderness Association

The Nature Conservancy

Oregon Natural Desert Association

Ralph Maughan's Wilderness Report

Sierra Club

Sinapu: Southern Rockies Wolf Web

Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance

Western Resource Advocates

The Wilderness Society

Wyoming Chapter of the Sierra Club


Interesting that there isn't any groups like RMEF, DU, FNAWS or the like that WWP partners up with.

Nemont
 
Nemont, many of those organizations are the ones I have check out and urged others to look at.
The ideas I have posted against have come right off alot of those web sites ,the same stuff Ithaca calls "conspiracy theories"
Its interesting how many of them support the same goals and are in fact linked to each other ----------end grazing,logging,mining,control public access,bring back predators,more wilderness area's.


And all the other things you posted ,yet the response is that those are nothing but "conspiracy theories".
These type of organizations love people that would rather use the ignore button then take the time to check out the full agenda.
 
"These are the people who influence the decision makers at WWP. Go look at the WWP's board of directors, nearly all of them belong to more then one of the organizations listed below or also sit on their boards and advisory councils. "

Jose ,How many of those organizations do you pay due's to???????? and are you on the pay roll of any of them ?

Ithaca??????? What about you.
I see some org. that both of you have posted support of.
 
Muledeer4me said:
Its interesting how many of them support the same goals and are in fact linked to each other ----------end grazing,logging,mining,control public access,bring back predators,more wilderness area's.
Wouldn't all of those things be good for hunters????
 

Forum statistics

Threads
113,610
Messages
2,026,604
Members
36,244
Latest member
ryan96
Back
Top