Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nobody is being forced to read any posts by mfb99. If you already know you're not going to like what he's saying or how he says it don't click on it.
Take a minute to read this link regarding the forest service, forest health, and NEPA.
https://www.evergreenmagazine.com/nepa/
100% factual and totally unbiased drivel coming from one of the best logging PR guys around. Come on man! To be fair though neither was the information coming from the OP.
I’ve discovered that I like beets and have been eating kale, beet, goat cheese salads with a balsamic on it
If you’re unfamiliar with ‘beeturia’ look it up. I thought I was dying the other day. If that happened, I’d never get to chase those 200”+ deer that thrive in AZ where that awful chaining took place.
Here is a presentation by one of the fire ecologists Peterson is referring to. If you care about the future of our Western forests, take about 14 minutes and watch this. Then we can have an intelligent discussion Robert.
https://www.ted.com/talks/paul_hess...ten_worse_and_what_we_can_do_about_it/up-next
Truer words have never been spoken by one of your experts. He's pretty much on line though.[FONT="] [/FONT][FONT="]But there is no future without lots of fire and lots of smoke.[/FONT]
People understand Shoots, I believe that Marks tone and constant bashing of Zinke has turned most people off from the true message he tries to bring.
I almost went to the emergency room after trying beets for the firs time a few years ago. Turns out I'm one of the small fraction of people who pee red after eating beets.
I won't argue that NEPA isn't important. I could argue, and for a long time, that current interpretation of NEPA implementation goes beyond what is needed and necessary.
While Mark's anti-Zinke rants do get old...the topics he brings up are certainly important to hunting, fishing, conservation. Someone asked if he even hunts, based on what he brings up I would say he does, or at least views conservation as very important. NEPA is important for conserving our fish and wildlife and the ecosystems they live. I would say that is pretty much essential to the future of hunting. There is development at any cost, no development, and responsible development. This administration is definitely pushing for the development at any cost end of the spectrum.
Usually this forum engages in intelligent discussion, so it is disappointing to see how this thread has gone, even if Mark's opening rants do get old. But if this is how we are gonna go, I had some deep fried crappies tonight. In the process of pickling some pike right now
Mark cut and pasted an editorial from the Western Watershed Project. They are an anti hunting, anti grazing, serial litigation organization. To be fair to Mark, I doubt he even knows who WWP are.
Here's an example of what they stand for.......
https://howlingforjustice.wordpress...hern-rockies-gray-wolves-for-five-more-years/
I won't argue that NEPA isn't important. I could argue, and for a long time, that current interpretation of NEPA implementation goes beyond what is needed and necessary.
I almost went to the emergency room after trying beets for the firs time a few years ago. Turns out I'm one of the small fraction of people who pee red after eating beets.