You could try the 132 HHT. Probly no gains in velocity but a bit better BC. Seems reports are the HHT expands more aggressively than the Hunter. mtmuleyHave the .284 131g Hunters in hand. Decided not to tinker Absolutes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You could try the 132 HHT. Probly no gains in velocity but a bit better BC. Seems reports are the HHT expands more aggressively than the Hunter. mtmuleyHave the .284 131g Hunters in hand. Decided not to tinker Absolutes.
Just might do that, this rifle isn’t getting a dial.You could try the 132 HHT. Probly no gains in velocity but a bit better BC. Seems reports are the HHT expands more aggressively than the Hunter. mtmuley
I’ve used the 124 HH on elk. They do just fine.I was just looking on the Hammer Bullets site. The .264 118 and 125 HHTs have my attention for loading both Manbun and PRC. I have a cow elk tag this year and if I get a good recipe cooked up, may seriously consider trying them. Need to get more 30-06 brass saved up to go with a .308 HHT
I’ve got some 118s & 125s loaded up over some RL16 to test in my 6.5-284 when I get home.I was just looking on the Hammer Bullets site. The .264 118 and 125 HHTs have my attention for loading both Manbun and PRC. I have a cow elk tag this year and if I get a good recipe cooked up, may seriously consider trying them. Need to get more 30-06 brass saved up to go with a .308 HHT