Hunt Talk Radio - Look for it on your favorite Podcast platform

Dubya loosens wildlife protection for energy development, logging and skiing

Oak

Expert
Joined
Dec 23, 2000
Messages
16,063
Location
Colorado
Federal agencies at odds on lynx plan
By Theo Stein

A Forest Service lynx-protection plan that exempts energy and logging projects may actually prevent the predator's recovery in the southern Rockies, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said Wednesday.

Forest Service officials originally proposed a stronger conservation strategy developed by their lynx biologists. But they inserted exemptions for oil and gas development, energy-transmission lines and healthy-forest projects to comply with recent White House policy directives.

"They're proceeding with a project that, frankly, doesn't look like it has much to do with recovering lynx," said Brian Crowder of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, which also panned the proposed lynx plan.

Colorado has invested millions of dollars to reintroduce the lynx in hopes of getting it off the endangered list.

State biologists have released 166 lynx since 1999 and have confirmed at least 29 lynx kittens, with more births expected this spring.

A USFWS spokeswoman said that if the Forest Service does not strengthen lynx protections, the federal wildlife agency will not consider lifting endangered-species protections for the lynx.

"When we listed the lynx, we said the main threat was inadequacy of regulatory mechanisms," USFWS spokeswoman Diane Katzenberger said.

She said her agency's concern is that the Forest Service is ignoring "their own lynx-conservation strategy."

If the current proposal is not strengthened, future ski-resort expansions, energy development, forest-thinning efforts and other projects may face delays while their impacts are analyzed, Katzenberger said.

State Division of Wildlife biologists asked for tighter scrutiny of ski-resort expansion and forest-road upgrades.

But officials from the state Department of Natural Resources argued that lynx are not bothered by ski resorts, saying that forest managers should be able to exempt road projects from lynx requirements when motorist safety is a concern.

EPA and USFWS officials have also criticized the Forest Service's decision to change lynx-protection standards, which must be followed, to guidelines, which forest managers can choose to ignore.

The lynx proposal, contained in a draft environmental impact statement released in January, will eventually become an amendment to the forest management plans that govern forest activities for 10 to 15 years.

It would apply to all U.S. forests in Colorado except for the White River National Forest.
 
I think the voters are gradually waking up to the fact that the Bush administration is about as anti-wildlife as they can get. All their lip service to hunting doesn't amount to anything if they're destroying wildlife habitat at a faster rate than any other administration.
 
Nut, I'm assuming you know the land is not actually closed to hunting, it's just worthless for hunting after it's been developed for oil, etc. Not always, though. The clearcuts can be good again after a few years. But we've all seen Buzz's picture of the oil and gas fields in WY with all the roads and pumping pads. No sense hunting there!
 
What does it take to do it, and fall into the category, "Not always."? That would be important to know how to do it right. Places here are good again after a while too, but this is not elk country like up there can be.

I hope they make them get the energy out a good way, or that American's stop using so much energy, or both. I remember when I was a kid reading that we were 6% if the world's population and used like 30% of the world's natural resources, us Americans.

Too many heaters, AC units, and vehicles, etc.
 
Tom- I'd bet my next paycheck that the figure's you quoted are worse now!

I agree that we have to have energy sources. However, until as many laws are being passed upping effeciency as are passed for new developments I'll be at a loss. The same session that was used for vote for drilling of ANWR a bill was rejected that would up the fuel efficiency of trucks and suv's. :confused:
 
I read something in the paper today that said the US demand for oil is 20 million barrels/day, which is 1/4 of the world production.

Oak
 
Amazing aint it, USA % population of the world is only 4.6, yet needs 25% of oil,just read an article that co2 emissions from the states is around 26%of the worlds so that would seem about right.
 
I don't see any of you guy's giving up any thing you have, only complaining about the use and where it comes from. It's a double edged sword and the stuff has to come from some where at some cost to the environment because that is where it has to come from, is it better to pull it from some one elses back yard so that you don't have to see the damage first hand? Makes it easier to sleep at night? Yes some of the pics that Buzz has shown does show massive damage, but there are more pics that can be shown that don't show any, I have some in my photo album if any one wants to take a look. I can also find more. Those pics I have seen posted don't show good elk country at all, matter of fact, I am pretty sure I have been on that same hill looking out over that area of oil/gas fields, you drive down into it and there are Antalope every where, more than I think I have seen in any other place I have traveled to. I didn't see many Mulies, but that didn't mean much out in an open flat expanse... ;)
 
Elkchsr,
1. You don't even know me, so how could you "see" whether I give up anything I have?

2. Yes, I would much rather the oil I use come from Ali I. Naimi's back yard than my own. I couldn't give a rat's ass what his back yard looks like, so yes, I'll sleep better at night.

3. Show me pictures of "no" damage. Remember, pictures can't show all damage, like animals no longer using traditional areas, etc.

4. Elk aren't the only animals I, and many other posters, are worried about.

Oak
 
Elkchsr- My point is that it is possible to build a reliable 4X4 truck that gets better than 17mi/gal. Why keep drilling for more oil when you can make what you have last longer? If I'm low on money I make sure to be more effecient in spending it. Also, I feel more comfortable about working to make 'my backyard' (the US and especially public lands) better than worrying about those in the Middle East. I don't complain about my neighbors backyard if mine looks as bad or worse.

In addition, I think the ones you claim are complaining are also doing alot more for the resources than the average Joe. I know Ithaca has been actively involved with a number of orgs/causes and Oak is pursuing and education/career that will allow him to make resource management better besides all what he has done thus far. So, I don't see this as a pot/kettle issue. These guys are sincere and active and are getting things done, not just complaining.
 
MTNTOUGH - Use promo code RANDY for 30 days free

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
113,608
Messages
2,026,577
Members
36,244
Latest member
ryan96
Back
Top