This can’t be trueOnly 30–50% of People Have an Internal Monologue.
Did you read this title with your own voice in your head? If not, I have some serious questions about you.eccentricemmie.medium.com
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This can’t be trueOnly 30–50% of People Have an Internal Monologue.
Did you read this title with your own voice in your head? If not, I have some serious questions about you.eccentricemmie.medium.com
I am not sure it is possible to critically think without one. How else do you synthesize multiple streams of information into coherent thoughts of your own?
Best way I could think to explain it is in the same way that your inner monologue has no preceding synthesis you are aware of - a monologue preceding the inner monologue that develops the sentences you hear - folks who don't have inner monologues thoughts work similarly.
One of the cruxes here is that of a voice in your brain. Most definitions of an inner monologue define it as such. I compare thoughts all the time, but it's just information exchange happening at a rate that I think is faster than spoken or imagined word - there is no inner voice, and it doesn't seem like one is required for multiple streams of information to bounce off of one another. I don't say it in a boastful way, but comparing many different streams of information into something coherent via a conversation in my head seems like a very inefficient way to do it. If I sit here right now and try to have a conversation with myself in my brain - really try to perceive hearing a conversation that only exists up there - it's actually very hard, and kind of feels like swimming against a current mentally.
what kind of personality type are you/do you consider yourself? myers briggs or whatever. type a? not type a?
there's gotta be some trends here.
what kind of personality type are you/do you consider yourself? myers briggs or whatever. type a? not type a?
there's gotta be some trends here.
Closeted Misanthrope
This thread sent me down an internet rabbit hole yesterday, and I came across this study:
Individual Differences in Frequency of Inner Speech: Differential Relations with Cognitive and Non-cognitive Factors
Inner speech plays a crucial role in behavioral regulation and the use of inner speech is very common among adults. However, less is known about individual differences in the frequency of inner speech use and about the underlying processes that may explain ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
"Results revealed that anxiety and impulsivity were mainly related to the frequency of the affective function of inner speech (self-criticism and self-reinforcement) and executive functions and complex reasoning were mainly related to the frequency of the cognitive, self-regulatory function of inner speech (self-management)."
Ultimately, I think it is interesting how we perceive our brains to be working. Maybe folks who don't have an inner monologue actually do have an inner monologue occurring all the time but never developed the observational tools to detect it. Brains are mysterious.
Had an older guy that worked for me for a while, would walk around mumbling to himself all day. I finally asked him how that non-so-inner monologue was going and he just remarked that sometimes, in order to have an intelligent conversation, he was forced to talk to himself.
Reminds me of that scene in Braveheart where the crazy Irish fella says "In order to find his equal, an Irishman is forced to talk to God."
Hal is getting scarier.Google news just pushed this to me
Researchers gave AI an 'inner monologue' and it massively improved its performance
Scientists trained an AI system to think before speaking with a technique called QuietSTaR. The inner monologue improved common sense reasoning and doubled math performance.www.livescience.com
Best way I could think to explain it is in the same way that your inner monologue has no preceding synthesis you are aware of - a monologue preceding the inner monologue that develops the sentences you hear - folks who don't have inner monologues thoughts work similarly.
One of the cruxes here is that of a voice in your brain. Most definitions of an inner monologue define it as such. I compare thoughts all the time, but it's just information exchange happening at a rate that I think is faster than spoken or imagined word - there is no inner voice, and it doesn't seem like one is required for multiple streams of information to bounce off of one another. I don't say it in a boastful way, but comparing many different streams of information into something coherent via a conversation in my head seems like a very inefficient way to do it. If I sit here right now and try to have a conversation with myself in my brain - really try to perceive hearing a conversation that only exists up there - it's actually very hard, and kind of feels like swimming against a current mentally.
Had an older guy that worked for me for a while, would walk around mumbling to himself all day. I finally asked him how that non-so-inner monologue was going and he just remarked that sometimes, in order to have an intelligent conversation, he was forced to talk to himself.
Ya, solid burn.And you were the guy who was near him when he was mumbling?