Sask hunter
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2016
- Messages
- 3,298
Also the massive culls we did had no effect just knocked the deer numbers down but CWD seems to be just a prevalent in cull areas vs non cull areas
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Great share, thanks. It is a bizarre disease that's for sure
"When prions from the most common polymorphism (wild type) present in white-tailed deer are used to experimentally infect white-tailed deer with different polymorphisms, the resulting prions have different properties. (182) As noted previously, while-tailed deer with rare genotypes show an extended incubation period before they succumb to the disease compared to wild type controls. (54,55) Furthermore, the distribution of CWD prions in the bodies of those white-tailed deer with some rare Prnp genotypes show less peripheral distribution than is observed in analogously infected wild type white-tailed deer. (183) This suggests that animals expressing these rare PrPC polymorphisms are more resistant to CWD infection and, if infected, may transmit CWD less efficiently. The prions from some of the orally dosed white-tailed deer expressing the rarer polymorphisms could be transmitted to wild type mice, while others could not."
Also, this link was interesting. I didn't know it was documented quite a while ago.
View attachment 261012
Idaho has only had cwd found in one area so far but that area has mandatory testing and does have carcass transportation rules in effect that don’t allow spinal or brain tissue To be removed from the areaIf. CWD is primarily transmitted directly from one infected specimen to another, but also spread (to some lesser extent) environmentally through soil and vegetation, why aren't more preventative measures being taken by Wildlife Agencies to limit cross-country contamination?
For example, a hunter shoots a deer in a known CWD area, but then takes the deer home without being tested (because it's not mandatory) and then disposes of some of the deer's body parts in his backyard where deer frequent. In doing so, did the hunter possibly pass CWD on to the local deer herd through soil contamination?
Colorado Parks and Wildlife goes to great lengths in trying to prevent the spread of Aquatic Nuisance Species from one waterway to another, but seemingly does very little to try and prevent hunters from spreading CWD around the Country. Is it not spread that way as easily as I'm imagining it could? Do other State Wildlife Agencies have policies regulating the transport and disposal of potentially CWD positive animals?
I know most western states are already doing this. Can’t bring skulls back from other states to have euros done and other restrictions. It’s hard to enforce and takes self policing but is good policy.If. CWD is primarily transmitted directly from one infected specimen to another, but also spread (to some lesser extent) environmentally through soil and vegetation, why aren't more preventative measures being taken by Wildlife Agencies to limit cross-country contamination?
For example, a hunter shoots a deer in a known CWD area, but then takes the deer home without being tested (because it's not mandatory) and then disposes of some of the deer's body parts in his backyard where deer frequent. In doing so, did the hunter possibly pass CWD on to the local deer herd through soil contamination?
Colorado Parks and Wildlife goes to great lengths in trying to prevent the spread of Aquatic Nuisance Species from one waterway to another, but seemingly does very little to try and prevent hunters from spreading CWD around the Country. Is it not spread that way as easily as I'm imagining it could? Do other State Wildlife Agencies have policies regulating the transport and disposal of potentially CWD positive animals?
Given our local area has a somewhat static prevalence rate from mainly hunter killed bucks of around 30%, increasing harvest on mature bucks means roughly 7 out of 10 bucks killed is disease free. In the end, IF it really lowers prevalence rates, we still have CWD on the landscape. Until game managers known a heck of a lot more than they do now, I'm a hard no on management strategies that call for lowering deer numbers in at or below objective herds.Given the best known control measure, at this time, is to keep mature buck numbers lower, the prescribed management strategies are being met with a lot of resistance from some hunters.
Appreciate the post & the info. Sobering facts that are hard to accept. Have watched the effects of a long term drought here in AZ on the desert mule deer herds, & the current management practices. The end result is the same, a landscape devoid of these animals. That is a trajedy.CWD continues to be one of those issues that causes a lot of fractures in the hunting community. Colorado Parks and Wildlife, a state that is ground zero for the disease in wild populations, has put out a video that I think help with the awareness of this issue.
A lot of hunters are skeptical of the data around CWD, as they haven't seen dead or sick deer. In this video, you will see some sick deer.
The first video (I assume another video is forthcoming, given they call this Part 1) is in Eastern Colorado, an area primarily private land. I get the feeling that CPW is hoping this video will appeal to private landowners in places where they control most of the hunting access and therefore they control the ability to manage a disease such as CWD.
Given the best known control measure, at this time, is to keep mature buck numbers lower, the prescribed management strategies are being met with a lot of resistance from some hunters. Montana already hammers deer and it seems like a strategy to lower numbers even further, at least on public land, is going to be met with resistance.
I talked to the CPW folks in charge of these management strategies. They are doing a ton of work on this. They had a couple good points as it relates to CWD, both focused on keeping hunters engaged and informed.
1. Be open and transparent with what you know, but even more so with what you don't know.
2. Balance the management strategies based on what you do know and with the interest of hunters who need to have trust that your agency is working to find more answers.
CWD is here and it becomes more of an issue every day. I often wonder how hunters would react if CWD only impacted does, not bucks. Would proposed management actions to control or lower the prevalence rates be as controversial? I think we all know the answer to that.
Hopefully the rate of understanding and management options grows at a faster pace than the spread or discovery of CWD.
P.S. If anyone knows where Part 2 and subsequent videos are, please post them to this thread.
All states have had transport restrictions in place for years.If. CWD is primarily transmitted directly from one infected specimen to another, but also spread (to some lesser extent) environmentally through soil and vegetation, why aren't more preventative measures being taken by Wildlife Agencies to limit cross-country contamination?
For example, a hunter shoots a deer in a known CWD area, but then takes the deer home without being tested (because it's not mandatory) and then disposes of some of the deer's body parts in his backyard where deer frequent. In doing so, did the hunter possibly pass CWD on to the local deer herd through soil contamination?
Colorado Parks and Wildlife goes to great lengths in trying to prevent the spread of Aquatic Nuisance Species from one waterway to another, but seemingly does very little to try and prevent hunters from spreading CWD around the Country. Is it not spread that way as easily as I'm imagining it could? Do other State Wildlife Agencies have policies regulating the transport and disposal of potentially CWD positive animals?
Most states in general. Alabama got their first case a few years ago and they've implemented the same steps as western states on bringing in deer from outside states. They even have billboards on some of the major interstates telling about it.I know most western states are already doing this. Can’t bring skulls back from other states to have euros done and other restrictions. It’s hard to enforce and takes self policing but is good policy.
I figured as much…just don’t know about anything East of Wyoming. I don’t pay much attention to foreign policies. HahaMost states in general. Alabama got their first case a few years ago and they've implemented the same steps as western states on bringing in deer from outside states. They even have billboards on some of the major interstates telling about it.
Georgia doesn't have any cases (yet) but starting last year we implemented the whole suite of restrictions, same with both Carolinas I think.
2002, Northeast of McCall on Crestline Trail, I saw a mulie doe that was CWD for sure. We didn’t know what the hell was wrong with her at the time. Deer was emaciated, wobbly, no concern about people.Idaho has only had cwd found in one area so far but that area has mandatory testing and does have carcass transportation rules in effect that don’t allow spinal or brain tissue To be removed from the area