Southern Elk
Well-known member
According to CBA the wolf lovers are going to be there in force and even bussing people in from out of town for the meeting
I wish us hunters were that well organized. We would outnumber them, if we were.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
According to CBA the wolf lovers are going to be there in force and even bussing people in from out of town for the meeting
Not sure if I'll make the meetings. I'm working down in the Springs and extremely busy.
I've provided comments for the CO issue, opposing the wolf expansion idea related to your original post.
That said, I would suggest using a pretty heavy filter when relying on elk-wolf information that relates to the Northern Yellowstone Herd. Here are a couple tidbits that will counter what I highlighted and bolded above.
One thing that was "new" was that MT FWP had 2,200 cow tags for that herd, even at the time that article was written. The success rates were off the charts for elk now residing on winter ranges. During the period of big decline, we were killing 2,000+ pregnant cows from that herd, which in effect was 2,500+ elk if you could expect a 25% calf recruitment rate. We did that for years.
The outfitter quoted in the comment you posted, Bill Hoppe, was one who screamed the loudest when FWP finally started reducing cow tags in that herd. He wanted to keep outfitting hunters to shoot these pregnant cows, but blamed it all on wolves.
The legislator quoted in that article, Joe Balyeat, also was a big sponsor for HB 42, a bill that forced MT FWP to reduced elk numbers to objective, no matter what. As such, if every wolf in MT died of disease 10 years ago, we would not be allowed to increase elk numbers in units at or over objective, thanks to the bill Balyeat helped get passed.
Those are actions that some will not tell as the rest of the story explaining some contributing factors to the decline of the Northern Yellowstone Herd. I provide them here, so you can see it was much more than wolves that hammered that herd to where it is now.
Yes, wolves do have a big impact. Shooting thousands of pregnant cow elk on their winter range for years on end will have a much bigger impact.
Back to your original post, I hope all of you will write CPW and ask them to adopt alternative #2.
They are already here, like it or not. There was one killed in Kremmling a few months ago. Where there's one, there's more....
You know it's pretty damn sad. I try to help CO out and post this on a car forum I belong too and the CO folks tell me to mind my own business basically and I'm full of BS and ignorant. I'm sure not glad I tried to help out CO people. OF course you get the wolf lovers, but I never expected to get this treatment from hunters form CO...well they claim they are hunters. Here's an example:
"As a Colorado native and current resident and elk hunter, I think I can speak for all Colorado residents and hunters when I say the only help we'd like from non-residents is to stay the f**k away during hunting and ski seasons. "
Stereotype much?
Haha. If we nonresidents stayed away, I'm guessing this dude wouldn't like what it did to the cost of his elk license when CPW had the resulting budget crisis.
You have a bad attitude dude.
We'll do fine without you.
How does MN have a bad attitude when he's going out of his way to help us in Colorado and sticking up for us? I know him personally and he will go out of his way when he feels something needs to be done and isn't right. He tried to help Colorado hunters and spread the word about the wolf issue and try to get some extra comments from out of staters. If that's a bad attitude, then, that's a bad attitude the state needs from our out of state hunters. He probably did more than 90% of Colorado hunters have done or will do.
You ask for help and I have a bad attitude? How is that? Please explain that comment.