It all depends on the language.Ben I am curious your perspective on this: Do you feel that a 2-year, coalition-led educational push culminating in attempting to pass an amendment guaranteeing Coloradans right to and fish like Florida just passed would be the logical next step? It seems to me that would be a way to positively redirect some of the organizational momentum that was built through the 127 opposition efforts.
But, if you don't like ballot box biology, is it hypocritical to pass a ballot initiative telling folks what they can and can't do in terms of hunting?
How do you account for nuances in wildlife management for species that aren't hunted? Typical NRA language says that hunting and angling will be the preferred methods of management. Does that mean we'll be hunting bats when there's too many of them? Does that mean only hunters can solve landowner problems with problematic concentrations?
I put my faith and trust in guys like @Oak because they have the temperament to bring people together, take the high road when every fiber in your being is telling you to throw hands instead, and not get sucked into the reactionary stuff that is too easy to fall into. I don't trust @Forkyfinder to have that same approach (But I still love ya, man! Would share a camp any day.).
So - more than anything I guess I am just saying, sit down, shut up, act like you've won before and wait for your entirely capable and thoughtful and damned strategic leaders to tell you what the next play is.