Californians build house in GNP. FCD demands halt and removal.

[El Jason]

Damn though, gloating never gets old when you're right. Now, stop whining, start learning why you were entirely wrong, correct what mislead you to that point, and, probably in 5, 7 maybe 10 years for ya, you can gloat when you're so (unsurprisingly) right amongst a group of clowns.

I sincerely hope this is not your best foot forward. Introspection might be warranted.

 

[Sytes]

All this for a property the jackholes spend two weeks in a year.

Airbnb / VRBO incoming...

 

[Straight Arrow]

Airbnb / VRBO incoming...

Highly likely as many tourist rentals in the area. May be why nobody really recognized a problem until construction progressed to point of the structure as as shown on images on this thread.

 

[mtmuley]

Highly likely as many tourist rentals in the area. May be why nobody really recognized a problem until construction progressed to point of the structure as as shown on images on this thread.

Someone was not doing their job to not see this progression. Moot point if it is all legal anyway. AGAIN, I don't agree with it. But I am not going to second guess what occurred. What if it was a generational Montanan building that home? mtmuley

 

[Mtn Dawg]

A You Tube Video which provides some more context:

 

[trackerbacker]

May be why nobody really recognized a problem until construction progressed to point of the structure as as shown on images on this thread.

Wait, I thought excavators were in the water? How'd they go unnoticed?

I mean, how could fcd, knowing exactly what when and where something was built, even okayed it, and continued their own personal record of continual incompetence.

I sincerely hope this is not your best foot forward. Introspection might be warranted.

Perhaps introspection is more fitting for those hoping destruction on others?

My best foot forward was informing chief falling wind long before judgement, what was correct, objectively, legally, and how things would play out

Everything after that was specifically for the losers that I noticed you have informed they should seek introspection.

One could concluded you're like one of those pieces of garbage who thinks someone's personal house should be destroyed because it interrupts the view you don't own, simply based on the lack of your stating the same to those who've said and begged for worse things to happen to innocent people.

But you're right, the individual correct on this whole thing should seek introspection.

Loser. Hahah

 

[Lostinthewoods]

If any of you need help on how to have conversations, debates, or disagreements without personal attacks, please let me know.

 

[El Jason]

Loser

I’m torn to pieces by your words. How did you ever see into my soul like that.

Carry on.

 

[Nick87]

If any of you need help on how to have conversations, debates, or disagreements without personal attacks, please let me know.

You're gonna be pretty busy for a while.

 

[Lostinthewoods]

You're gonna be pretty busy for a while.

You’re not wrong.

I’m gonna change my name to “thorn bush”. I’m going to be a “prick” with these couple day cooling period bans, but people will just keep walking through them.

 

[Sytes]

You’re not wrong.

I’m gonna change my name to “thorn bush”. I’m going to be a “prick” with these couple day cooling period bans, but people will just keep walking through them.

I imagine this applies to those popular here as well. I appreciate your moderator status. Hopefully, moving forward with your active status people understand they too must refrain from school yard bully b.s. personal attacks.

I look forward to calling them out when they opt towards personal attacks.

**It is far too simple to rail on a person who's not well known. People tend to pom pom cheer on the well known while they ridicule others that may hold differing opinions.

It's clear I'm far from a fan of this guy, as is or should be evident though I expect this to apply towards ALL Hunt Talk members.