Californians build house in GNP. FCD demands halt and removal.

I agree. And while I don't necessarily agree with what the Ambler's have done, if it was all legal not much to talk about. I also think it is hard to believe that that home got to that level of construction it did without someone noticing it. Seems regulations should have been in place prior. mtmuley
Agreed as well. Unfortunately it takes situations like this to create the impetus for said regulations. Regulations upon regulations and more regulations, as we all get buried in regulations. And the regulatory apparatus to support them. And I am no lover of them yet here we are everywhere. There was a time when folks used common sense and common courtesy and a certain contextual respect for the community over their individual selfish interests. Not only is that thing ugly as get out architecturally it’s a middle finger to the concept of the national park.
 
Damn though, gloating never gets old when you're right. Now, stop whining, start learning why you were entirely wrong, correct what mislead you to that point, and, probably in 5, 7 maybe 10 years for ya, you can gloat when you're so (unsurprisingly) right amongst a group of clowns.
I sincerely hope this is not your best foot forward. Introspection might be warranted.
 
Highly likely as many tourist rentals in the area. May be why nobody really recognized a problem until construction progressed to point of the structure as as shown on images on this thread.
Someone was not doing their job to not see this progression. Moot point if it is all legal anyway. AGAIN, I don't agree with it. But I am not going to second guess what occurred. What if it was a generational Montanan building that home? mtmuley
 
Ollin Magnetic Digiscoping Systems

Forum statistics

Threads
114,650
Messages
2,066,295
Members
36,698
Latest member
cliomarston1
Back
Top