BuzzH
Well-known member
So, was attending the Wyoming Wildlife Task Force meeting today, minding my own business, like I always do...and ran into some outfitter from Montana.
He saw my shirt with the BHA logo, should have changed shirts after the OWAA panel. He walked over started railing away about the "bulls for billionaires" and how he doesn't agree and really jumps on the soap box about how unfair that name is.
He asked what I thought was wrong about the way the tags were given to the billionaires last year. He told me how it was more than fair to the public lands hunter. I disagreed, and man whoever that dude was, he wasn't really happy.
Was sitting next to a buddy and he said, "I don't think he expected you to answer his questions that way".
I guess the truth was troublesome to hear.
But, really, thanks to the Montana hunters that came up with that...it apparently touched a nerve enough to have a Montana guy come clear down to Casper to complain about it to me.
Maybe you guys in Montana can be more sympathetic...he didn't find a welcoming shoulder to cry on down this way.
Funny...
Oh, and WOGA got to carry on for 4-5 hours asking for 100% of the NR Special draw tags for deer, elk, pronghorn (40% of NR tags). There was copious outfitter comments complaining and trashing:
1. Every license/application service mostly huntin'fool but none were spared.
2. DIY NR hunters, they take all the tags and drive point creep.
3. Resident hunters who are also greedy.
4. License application services that have large data bases.
Etc.
Etc.
We had the privilege of listening to the outfitters from Idaho, New Mexico, etc. and how great those programs are for "stabilizing" the industry. Sy told us how lucky we are he didn't go for a 50% of the NR tags, he thought asking for only 40% was appropriate qualification for sainthood.
I guess preference system, tiered license fee structure, and wilderness guide law just isn't working anymore for them.
It was truly something to witness...and I testified against the outfitter proposal.
He saw my shirt with the BHA logo, should have changed shirts after the OWAA panel. He walked over started railing away about the "bulls for billionaires" and how he doesn't agree and really jumps on the soap box about how unfair that name is.
He asked what I thought was wrong about the way the tags were given to the billionaires last year. He told me how it was more than fair to the public lands hunter. I disagreed, and man whoever that dude was, he wasn't really happy.
Was sitting next to a buddy and he said, "I don't think he expected you to answer his questions that way".
I guess the truth was troublesome to hear.
But, really, thanks to the Montana hunters that came up with that...it apparently touched a nerve enough to have a Montana guy come clear down to Casper to complain about it to me.
Maybe you guys in Montana can be more sympathetic...he didn't find a welcoming shoulder to cry on down this way.
Funny...
Oh, and WOGA got to carry on for 4-5 hours asking for 100% of the NR Special draw tags for deer, elk, pronghorn (40% of NR tags). There was copious outfitter comments complaining and trashing:
1. Every license/application service mostly huntin'fool but none were spared.
2. DIY NR hunters, they take all the tags and drive point creep.
3. Resident hunters who are also greedy.
4. License application services that have large data bases.
Etc.
Etc.
We had the privilege of listening to the outfitters from Idaho, New Mexico, etc. and how great those programs are for "stabilizing" the industry. Sy told us how lucky we are he didn't go for a 50% of the NR tags, he thought asking for only 40% was appropriate qualification for sainthood.
I guess preference system, tiered license fee structure, and wilderness guide law just isn't working anymore for them.
It was truly something to witness...and I testified against the outfitter proposal.