Nemont
Well-known member
So by not signing the contract Mr. Bundy forfeited his grazing permit he had with the BLM. In addition by not signing and paying then pursuing a legal remedy Mr. Bundy forfeited his standing in the Courts of this country.
Mr. Bundy didn't purchase any water rights, they were adjudicated under the state laws of Nevada. Since this land was grazed by Bundy's, at least as they claim, if they filed their water rights and had them adjudicated by the states water court all they had tied up in the water rights is the filing fee and any associated costs of getting the waters rights recorded. Those water rights on adjoining lands do not confer a right to graze public lands period. They simply grant a first in line right to the water, not the grass. On BLM the water rights for public use are reserved, including watering of cattle.
The reason that there is no compensation for AUM's is because there is no right or ownership in those AUM's that was transferred to the permitee. If you leased private grazing and then the land owner decided to reduce the number of cattle on their land, would they owe you compensation for not leasing you the grazing they own? The answer is self evident.
If this is your argument then you are simply full of hot air.
Nemont
Mr. Bundy didn't purchase any water rights, they were adjudicated under the state laws of Nevada. Since this land was grazed by Bundy's, at least as they claim, if they filed their water rights and had them adjudicated by the states water court all they had tied up in the water rights is the filing fee and any associated costs of getting the waters rights recorded. Those water rights on adjoining lands do not confer a right to graze public lands period. They simply grant a first in line right to the water, not the grass. On BLM the water rights for public use are reserved, including watering of cattle.
Federal Reserved Water Rights and the Bureau of Land Management:
The following types of federal reserved water rights can occur on BLM lands: public water holes
and springs; mineral hot springs; stock driveways; public oil shale withdrawals; wild and scenic
rivers; national monuments and conservation areas; and wilderness areas.
Probably the most common federal reserved water right for BLM is for public water holes and
springs. These rights were created by executive orders called Public Water Reserves (PWR).
Until 1926, PWRs were created on an ad hoc and sight specific basis. Federal agencies would
identify the springs they wanted reserved and these would be incorporated (by executive order)
into a chronologically numbered Public Water Reserve. Therefore PWRs with early numbers refer
to sight specific reservations. In 1926, a cart blank Public Water Reserve was created through an
executive order by President Coolidge entitled "Public Water Reserves No. 107". PWR 107
ended the sight specific system of reserving springs and water holes. The purpose of PWR 107
was to reserve natural springs and water holes yielding amounts in excess of homesteading
requirements. This order states that "legal subdivision(s) of public land surveys which is vacant,
unappropriated, unreserved public land and contains a spring or water hole, and all land within
one quarter of a mile of every spring or water be reserved for public use". There was no intent to
reserve the entire yield of each public spring or water hole, rather reserved water was limited to
domestic human consumption and stockwatering. All waters from these sources in excess of the
minimum amount necessary for these limited public watering purposes is available for
appropriation through state water law. To date, many of these Public Water Reserves have not
been registered with the state and/or are not adjudicate
The reason that there is no compensation for AUM's is because there is no right or ownership in those AUM's that was transferred to the permitee. If you leased private grazing and then the land owner decided to reduce the number of cattle on their land, would they owe you compensation for not leasing you the grazing they own? The answer is self evident.
If this is your argument then you are simply full of hot air.
Nemont
Last edited: