BigHornRam
Well-known member
Sad Buzz how quick you are to point out bad forestry practices by the industry back in the 60s and 70s yet went out of your way to dismiss even worse forestry "work" conducted by your own agency in 2015 as demonstrated in this link.Need glasses?
The public should see both sides of what they're buying, not a cherry picked photo showing balsam root covered south slopes and cut over low-mid elevation DF stands.
They're getting a lot of weed problems, road problems, sediment problems, under-stocked clear-cuts, over-stocked clear-cuts, cut over sub-alpine type stuff that wasn't slashed properly...just to name a few of the potential management challenges the BLM/public is going to get stuck with. All of which is subject to 80+ year stand rotations...best case. Not to mention terrible budgets that provide very little funding for management.
Your Public Land
Some "quality" forestry work conducted on your National Forest lands. Forest Service has been informed and hopefully I can get some acceptable answers from them. Not holding my breath. Time for a big shake up in the USFS IMO.
www.hunttalk.com