dgibson
New member
I'm having a hiring problem that just fascinates me. Without going into specifics, I am offering a full-time job in my department that would represent a 67% increase in pay over what another department's part-time employees make. We're not talking lots and lots of money here, but it's more than minimum wage. Traditionally, these people jump on the chance to move because of the pay increase. The job is a little more difficult than their current job, but not 67% more difficult. (It's basically moving from sitting on your butt 75% of the time to sitting on your butt 50% of the time. )
However, I've been told twice now that it's not worth it because my position requires that they work weekends. They'd still have (at least) two nights off a week, they just wouldn't fall on Saturday or Sunday. Did I mention a 67% pay increase?!?! |oo
Are your weekends that important to you, that you'd pass a relatively huge jump in money? If it were a situation like Flipper's where you're working like a dog all the time it'd be one thing, but we're talking about passing because your work days didn't fall in the right sequence. I guess next I'll be sitting in a rocking chair talking about how these young whippersnappers don't know what "work" is.
However, I've been told twice now that it's not worth it because my position requires that they work weekends. They'd still have (at least) two nights off a week, they just wouldn't fall on Saturday or Sunday. Did I mention a 67% pay increase?!?! |oo
Are your weekends that important to you, that you'd pass a relatively huge jump in money? If it were a situation like Flipper's where you're working like a dog all the time it'd be one thing, but we're talking about passing because your work days didn't fall in the right sequence. I guess next I'll be sitting in a rocking chair talking about how these young whippersnappers don't know what "work" is.