Irrelevant
Well-known member
Of course, the APR represents competitionWilks are funding a lot of the anti-APR work, btw.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Of course, the APR represents competitionWilks are funding a lot of the anti-APR work, btw.
Competition for land acquisition or what?Of course, the APR represents competition
yepland acquisition
Competition for land acquisition or what?
My take on the "No federal land grab!" slogan of those opposing APR is that since acquisition of the ranches included BLM leases, the theory is that it amounts to a "federal land grab". Of course, if one of the UPOM members purchased the ranch with BLM leases, that would just be ranching and "saving the cowboy".... how is this a public land grab?
While not what the ARP opponents seem to be saying, you could view it like the Wilks, buy the private surrounding public then close off access the public.If a private land owner sells to a private land buyer, how is this a public land grab?
1. There is a serious ammount of money and effort being pumped into lab grown meat.
Please explain relevance.Half a million people are sleeping rough tonight.
I'm not a big fan of large private land ownership. Even if they claim to be all kinds of conservation minded, and promise to maybe let someone hunt it. There are a lot of people who don't have a piece of dirt to sleep on or call their own, yet 100 people own 2% of land in America, one guy owns two Delaware's. Those 100 owners are growing their acreage by a half million acres per year. Probably not a lot of street people want to go crash on a piece of eastern MT, but anyone who does want a piece of land cheap is getting priced out of more all the time.Please explain relevance.
Fortunately some of them actually transfer those claims to actions which are real.Even if they claim to be all kinds of conservation minded ...
As someone who lives near his Flying D Ranch, attended his news conference after purchase, reviewed the Flying D conservation easement, has conversed with Ted as he recreated on the road by my house, met his son Beau and a couple grandchildren, volunteers during the annual Gateway Youth Group environmental summit on the Flying D Ranch, knows Ted's caretaker, his cook, and his ranch manager, is married to someone who actually lived on the Flying D at one time, reluctantly met Jane Fonda (as a skeptical Vietnam veteran), I have closely watched Ted Turner's rhetoric and actions for several decades. Although he has the consistent propensity to appear arrogant, he is the real deal and has literally put his money where his mouth is. Even if one dislikes his persona, it is difficult to criticize his conservation work and successes. As far as his plan, there is a Turner Foundation and spin-offs which will perpetuate his philosophy and the extent of his legacy. Obviously the conservation easements emplace the conservation and preservation practices on many of his vast properties. (Ironically, even perhaps humorously, the Flying D easement restricts the division of property to three parcels ... although Ted has four children.)Curiously (at least to me), no one has mentioned Terrible Ted. I've never really understood what Turner's grand plan is - but have always thought there must be one.
Now, he is getting mighty old, and I wonder what will happen with his empire. Is he still a land accumulator?