I am frustrated by it, but here is a question with some context.
I am on a local committee centered around Parks, Trails, and Recreation for the county in which I live. It's a conundrum. On one hand, we want to bring folks to our communities to spend their money, and help local economies/small businesses etc. On the other, if you surveyed the residents of Jefferson County, the majority would tell us to shut the hell up, and quit advertising those historically seldom-visited chunks of earth tied to their identity.
I think a fuzzy fault line in those survey responses would be business owners and those who rely on them vs those further downstream. We all love Montana in a way tied to its lack of crowds, and yet for half a century, Montana has been ranked in the last five or six states in terms of ability of its residents to generate wealth. For a long time it's been low wages, inclement weather, great hunting and fishing.
The Dept of Commerce's role is to generate business to some degree. So for those of you who are business owners, has the explosion of Montana's population benefitted you? Do you know folks, particularly business owners, who have struggled for years who are finally gaining ground financially? I do, and they matter, and it's a balance and yet seems unsustainable to the point where eventually, one must ask themselves the question: What good is wealth when a place has gone to hell for keeps in the ways that mattered most to you?
I don't know the answer, but I do believe if we ceased all advertising and coaxing in the name of tourism and business, it would have a negligible effect on the deluge which seems inevitable.
I’m a business owner. I’d prefer the growth stops.