Another Native vs. Transplant Montanan Conflict.....

BigHornRam

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 15, 2004
Messages
14,115
Location
"Land of Giant Rams"
Some people get upset about cutting down a tree on Buzz and Jose's public lands......so how can you defend FOR PROFIT brutal murder of cute fuzzy animals on the same public lands?

Trapping is under all out assault in Montana the last few years. Would be surprised if it is still legal in 10 years from now. And you hear very little from sportsmen about it. Just another brick in the wall, right DD?

Man posts video after dog snared in trap
By PERRY BACKUS of the Ravalli Republic



Watch a video about the incident that left Otis the beagle-cross caught in a leghold trap: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IM0DnvSNSo

HAMILTON - A week ago Saturday, Steve Slocomb joined the ranks of Montanans opposed to trapping.

It happened on a cross-country ski outing with a friend up Lost Horse Road south of Hamilton.


The pair had skied about a mile or so up the road when Slocomb's 8-year-old beagle-cross named Otis disappeared.

“I assumed he was just up in front of us somewhere running through the woods,” Slocomb said. “Normally he stays within 100 feet or so, but he seemed particularly rambunctious that day.”

After skiing for a mile or so without seeing the dog, Slocomb started getting nervous. They turned back toward the car, stopping occasionally to call for Otis.

“About a half-mile from the car, we heard some barking,” he said. “We called again and we could hear some whimpering coming from the forest. We followed the sound.”

With darkness falling and a winter storm predicted that night, Slocomb said the search was becoming frantic.

He found his dog about 20 feet off the road. Its front paw was caught in a leghold trap. Another trap was snapped shut on Otis' shoulder.

“I was freaking out because I couldn't figure out how to get the traps off,” Slocomb said. “The chain and cable attached to the traps were wrapped around everything.”

He cut through the cable and unwrapped it from around the dog's paw. It took some time, but Slocomb figured out how the traps worked and pulled them off his dog.

“I don't know how long it took, but it seemed like an eternity,” he said.

Otis survived the ordeal, but that didn't change Slocomb's mind about trapping.

“I am rather angry about the whole thing, especially that there was nothing illegal about the trap and how it was set 20 feet from the road,” Slocomb said. “I will offer my services to any media campaign that will help us ban trapping in Montana. It is an archaic throwback to an earlier time when people were living off the land.”

The professional videographer posted a video on the Web site YouTube, to let people know about his displeasure.

“I hope it goes viral,” he said.

Montana Trappers Association President Tom Barnes said incidents like this one are regrettable.

“No trapper wants to catch anyone's pet,” the Dillon man said. “We all have pets of our own.”

When incidents like this occur, the question always arises: Were the traps legally set? If they were - which they appear to have been in this case - then there's not much that Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks can do, Barnes said.

The Montana Trappers Association will again support legislation this year requiring beginning trappers to take an educational course, he said. The association also has offered classes on how to open traps to pet owners in Missoula and elsewhere around the state.

“The Montana Trappers Association has a long history of providing education for trappers,” Barnes said. “We've done many, many, many hours of trapper education over the years.”

The association won't support any legislation that would require trappers to check their traps on a certain schedule, he said, but might consider a law requiring signs at a trailhead if the association was involved in developing the legislation.

“We don't necessarily want people to know where our traps are,” Barnes said. “There are people out there who would look for and then disable them. ? It's an illegal act to mess with another man's traps or snares.”

Nearly all of the conflict between trappers and the public is focused on the western third of the state, but Barnes said it is a statewide issue.

“There are just more people and they live in closer proximity to trails,” Barnes said.

Those opposed to trapping want people to think that every dog that roams off trail is being caught in a trap, Barnes said.

“That's simply not true,” he said. “It is a minute percent that actually get caught in a trap. It's a hard situation, but why should a whole industry be shut down because of it?”

Barnes said trappers are continually making concessions and pointed to the pilot program in the Missoula area where trappers have agreed to stay out of popular recreation areas.

“Those areas are closed to trapping,” he said. “How much is enough?”

FWP Region 2 spokesperson Vivaca Crowser said an advisory group met last winter to look for ways to address some of the public's concerns related to trapping.

The Region 2 Trapping Working Group recommended that three popular recreational areas near Missoula be off limits to trapping. Pattee Canyon, Blue Mountain and the Rattlesnake Recreation Areas are now trap-free.

“Everyone, including trappers in the group, agreed that these areas were not very conducive to trapping,” Crowser said. “This was a first step and now we'll see how it goes. There may be other areas that we'll look at in the future.”

Crowser expects the state Legislature to take up the issue of mandatory education classes for new trappers again in the 2009 session. FWP has also developed brochures that pet owners can use to learn more about how traps operate in case their animal is caught.

In the meantime, Slocomb said he's worried about Otis every time he takes his dog for run.

“Now my wife doesn't want me to take him into the woods anymore,” Slocomb said on his YouTube video. “My little dog loves hiking and running around. He goes with me everywhere. I don't know. It's just a bad deal. He's not a happy camper.”

Jeff Darrah, FWP's Region 2 warden captain, said the issue is a tough one for those participating in trapping.

“It's a no-win deal for trappers,” Darrah said. “A lot of people end up dead set against trapping after a dog gets caught. It probably happens in the Bitterroot more than anywhere else in the state.”

“On the west side, the trailheads start at the bottom of every one of those canyons and they go straight up the bottom,” he said. “It's a pretty tough situation when you have people walking their dogs in the same place where others are trying to trap.”
 
I know Buzz is a big fan of trapping GH. So why doesn't he get as mad about this as he does about other issues? Next "archaic throwback to an earlier time when people were living off the land.” they could be going after could be public land hunting.
 
BHR,

Why should I get mad about some guy getting his dog stuck in a trap?

Maybe the douchebag will learn to keep his mutt on a leash.

The anti-trappers are such a nitwit, disorganized bunch that there really isnt anything to worry about.

It reminds me of the black helicopter crew that say if you hunt or own a firearm you HAVE to support the NRA or the gubbermint will send the jack-booted thugs to round up your firearms.

Go sell crazy somewhere else.
 
The anti-trappers are such a nitwit, disorganized bunch that there really isnt anything to worry about.

That's what Colorado trappers thought, right before they lost the right to use legholds and snares.
 
Why is it that everybody who moves to the Bitterroot (or anywhere in Western Montana) for the lifestyle wants to change the lifestyle once they get there. Fricking transplants, probably another Californian.

Nemont
 
I think a bigger issue with trapping is the price of fur. A lot of people lost interest when the price of gas was higher than the price they could get for the furs. The lack of interest and a "don't care" attitude by most people allows anti-trappers to create legislation that would limit or completely end trapping. The key is to keep people interested (next generation) and keep people educated on the subject. This also ties into hunting in general. You take away enough opportunity and people lose interest in the sport...when the "problems" outweigh the benefits, fewer people will be into the sport and willing to fight to keep the sport active. Trapping has a lot of barriers/ "problems" to keep the sport going.
 
Nemont,

I agree 100%.

I also hear what Oak is saying and agree, but IMO, Montana is still "old school" enough to probably not have much to worry about with trapping.

I see letters to the editors in the Missoulian, but I've never seen anything close to a ballot initiative.
 
Trapping is a method of hunting long since past. Just as Dubya failed to live up to the modern world's obligations by his steadfast stubborn refusal to sign the treaty to ban the use of land mines.
 
NoHarley,

Do you randomly go out and indiscriminately kill what ever critter that happens to be near you?

No other part of hunting do we not care what we kill. Just like Dubya and his landmines refusing to join the civilized world community in the banning of landmines.
 
Why ban landmines? The problem with "precision" munitions these days is the lack of collateral damage and consequently, the "fear factor" good ol legendary weapons like fat man, little boy, and mass B-52carpet bombings had. Japan waved white flags in 6 days..
 
JC,

So, you think traps indiscriminately kill animals...LMAO.

The owner of the dog believes so....:(


Buzz, I am willing to be edjumacated, but I don't see the purpose of trapping. I don't wear muskrat coats. The only beaver I like has two legs. I can't see myself wearing otter or mink...

I don't like the commercial harvest of wildlife for industrial purposes.



Why should trapping be allowed in the 21st century?
 
Why ban landmines? The problem with "precision" munitions these days is the lack of collateral damage and consequently, the "fear factor" good ol legendary weapons like fat man, little boy, and mass B-52carpet bombings had. Japan waved white flags in 6 days..


Greenhorn,

Haven't we seen a bunch of whiney-assed "hunters" on hear crapping in their pants because they are afraid of some wolves sneaking up on them while they gut their 390 bowkill Elk in Montana/Idaho/Wyoming?

Haven't the houndguys been posting pictures of the consequential damages on their pack when the "collateral damage" from the wolf reintroduction gets their hounds?
 
Greenhorn,

Haven't we seen a bunch of whiney-assed "hunters" on hear crapping in their pants because they are afraid of some wolves sneaking up on them while they gut their 390 bowkill Elk in Montana/Idaho/Wyoming?

Haven't the houndguys been posting pictures of the consequential damages on their pack when the "collateral damage" from the wolf reintroduction gets their hounds?

Sure I bet everybody's terrified of gutting an elk.. wolves and grizzly fears. I usually dress my game in the dark, alone, in the Lee Metcalf, Bob Marshall, or Absaroka beartooth wilderness areas while jamming out to my IPOD.

I can only hope some wolves stick their noses into some well-loaded connibears..
 
JC the word is "here" crapping (or crapping here) unless you actually "hear" yourself crapping while discussing this thread...carry on!
 
Advertisement

Forum statistics

Threads
113,017
Messages
2,006,935
Members
35,953
Latest member
PrestonThayne
Back
Top