Pucky Freak
Well-known member
I guess my question should be which cities make you take a shit and shoot heroin in the ghetto, and which ones allow you to do it in front of children and tourist/ in the city’s core areas, in front of expensive real estate, hotels, restaurants, and centers for business and commerce?
Many liberal cities experiment with unconventional social policies, which have lead some interesting…outcomes. It is not just about human misery being on display, but also government practices that attract criminals to relocate to those places.
LA, SF, and Seattle are in a league of their own. The open secret among those running these places is that they have a major crime problem. When the politicians talk about it, they refer to it as a housing problem and/or a substance use problem.
There are many second-tier cities that are not nearly as bad as the first three, such as San Diego, Portland, Chicago, Philly, Denver, Columbia, Detroit, Albuquerque. A common thread with cities like these is there are very clean/nice areas, but then also areas within them that are severely under-policed, which creates neighborhoods with very visible human misery of defecating on the ground, used needles strewn about, a menagerie of street prostitutes, etc.
Some “small enough” cities have relatively efficient bureaucracies to stay on top of petty crime, keeping it hidden. I’d be happy to introduce you to all 65 unsheltered persons in Des Moines in one day.
In the other end of the spectrum, NYC is a decent example of staying on top of their issues, which is impressive considering how populated the place is.